Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nuclear Fusion02:45

Nuclear Fusion

33.7K
The process of converting very light nuclei into heavier nuclei is also accompanied by the conversion of mass into large amounts of energy, a process called fusion. The principal source of energy in the sun is a net fusion reaction in which four hydrogen nuclei fuse and ultimately produce one helium nucleus and two positrons.
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
33.7K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods01:08

Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods

571
Renal clearance is a critical parameter encompassing kidney filtration, secretion, and reabsorption processes. It is calculated using a specific equation to determine the rate at which the kidneys clear a drug.
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
571
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

55.5K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
55.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fragment-Based Design of Targeted Covalent Inhibitors: The Scope and Limitation of Linking Approaches.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

3-Amidinophenylalanine-Derived Inhibitors' Antiviral Effect Against H1N1 Influenza A Virus.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Benchmarking p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> Prediction Algorithms against an Extensive, Public Data Set.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

AI-Assisted Discovery and Optimization of Small-Molecule TREM2 Agonists with Functional Microglial Activity.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Sum of Euclidean distance differences and sum of absolute Manhattan distance differences: multicriteria decision making tools for small data tables.

Analytica chimica acta·2025
Same author

Evaluation of single-template ligand-based methods for the discovery of small-molecule nucleic acid binders.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.2K

Comparison of Data Fusion Methods as Consensus Scores for Ensemble Docking.

Dávid Bajusz1, Anita Rácz2, Károly Héberger3

  • 1Medicinal Chemistry Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar tudósok krt. 2, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 27, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Ensemble docking uses multiple protein structures to improve drug screening. This study compares seven data fusion rules, suggesting geometric and harmonic means outperform the standard minimum rule for better virtual screening performance.

Keywords:
AUCBEDROCROC curveSRDdata fusionensemble docking

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
Method for Measurement of Viral Fusion Kinetics at the Single Particle Level
14:59

Method for Measurement of Viral Fusion Kinetics at the Single Particle Level

Published on: September 7, 2009

13.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.2K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
Method for Measurement of Viral Fusion Kinetics at the Single Particle Level
14:59

Method for Measurement of Viral Fusion Kinetics at the Single Particle Level

Published on: September 7, 2009

13.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Ensemble docking is a key technique in structure-based virtual screening, aiming to improve accuracy by considering protein flexibility.
  • A consensus score is typically derived from individual docking scores using data fusion, commonly the minimum score rule.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically compare seven different data fusion rules for ensemble docking.
  • To identify optimal fusion rules for enhancing virtual screening performance across diverse drug targets.

Main Methods:

  • A detailed statistical comparison of seven fusion rules was performed.
  • Five case studies involving current drug targets were utilized.
  • Sevenfold cross-validation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed.
  • Performance was evaluated using four distinct metrics, visualized in bubble plots.

Main Results:

  • The study identified significant differences in performance among the seven fusion rules.
  • The generally applied minimum fusion rule was found to be suboptimal.
  • Geometric and harmonic means demonstrated superior performance compared to the minimum rule.

Conclusions:

  • Geometric and harmonic means are recommended as improved alternatives for data fusion in ensemble docking.
  • These methods offer enhanced performance for structure-based virtual screening.
  • The findings contribute to optimizing computational approaches in drug discovery.