Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Gastric Motility01:16

Gastric Motility

2.9K
Gastric motility is the coordinated contraction and relaxation of stomach muscles that convert ingested food into chyme, a semi-liquid substance ready for further digestion in the intestines. The process begins with the vagus nerve inducing the relaxation of the smooth muscles in the fundus and body of the stomach, allowing these regions to expand and accommodate up to approximately 1.5 liters of food and liquid.
Peristaltic Waves and Chyme Formation
Upon food entry, the stomach initiates...
2.9K
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications01:25

Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications

598
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a medical process that removes waste products and excess fluid from the body using the peritoneal membrane as a natural filter.Peritoneal Dialysis MethodsSeveral methods can be used for peritoneal dialysis, including Acute Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis, and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis, also known as Continuous Cyclic Peritoneal Dialysis.Acute Intermittent Peritoneal Dialysis (AIPD) is used for patients with uremic...
598
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.0K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

UBE2L6 promotes invasion and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer by enhancing autophagy through STK38 ISGylation.

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS·2026
Same author

The impact of aftertreatment technology evolution on greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty trucks in China.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

Off-Road Vehicle Trauma in Southern California: Association With the Social Vulnerability Index.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

Comprehensive exploration and comparison of chemical constituents of Paris polyphylla var. chinensis and Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis through two-dimensional chromatography, metabolomic analysis and furostanosides quantitation.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same author

Computed tomography staging of colon cancer: improved patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy with combined radiologic tumor and nodal staging.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

Synergistic Induction of Apoptosis by Apocytochrome C and Sodium Aescinate Is Mediated by Excessive Autophagy via the AKT-mTOR-TFEB Signaling Axis.

Cell biochemistry and function·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
10:28

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT

Published on: January 22, 2018

11.5K

Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Risk Score.

Liang Ji1, Matthew J Selleck2, John W Morgan1,3

  • 1School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Annals of Surgical Oncology
|July 27, 2019
PubMed
Summary

A new risk score helps identify patients with gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). This score, based on demographic and tumor factors, predicts PC risk and aids early detection.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.5K
Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis
10:58

Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis

Published on: July 18, 2016

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
10:28

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT

Published on: January 22, 2018

11.5K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
03:05

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

1.5K
Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis
10:58

Quantitation of Intra-peritoneal Ovarian Cancer Metastasis

Published on: July 18, 2016

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Cancer Epidemiology

Background:

  • Gastric cancer (GC) peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) presents a significant challenge with poor prognosis.
  • While individual factors like grade, histology, and stage are linked to PC, their combined impact remains unclear.
  • This necessitates a tool to assess cumulative risk for better patient stratification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a cumulative risk score for gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (GCPC).
  • To utilize individual demographic and tumor characteristics for risk prediction.
  • To enable customized surveillance and early identification of PC in gastric cancer patients.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of patient-level data from the California Cancer Registry (2004-2014).
  • Development of a keyword search algorithm to identify gastric PC cases.
  • Multivariable logistic regression in a testing cohort to identify risk factors, followed by validation in a separate cohort to create and apply the GCPC risk score.

Main Results:

  • Identified 4285 gastric adenocarcinoma patients; key risk factors for PC included T4 stage, overlapping tumor location, age 20-40 years, and Hispanic ethnicity.
  • A cumulative GCPC risk score was developed using age, race/ethnicity, T stage, histology, tumor grade, and location.
  • Higher GCPC scores correlated with an increased percentage of patients developing PC.

Conclusions:

  • Demographic and tumor characteristics can effectively stratify gastric cancer patients by their risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
  • The developed GCPC risk score aids in understanding the cumulative effect of high-risk features.
  • This tool can assist clinicians in tailoring surveillance strategies and facilitating early PC detection.