A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality in primary cytoreductive surgery compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian malignancy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Personalized Medicine in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: February 23, 2024
Helena C Bartels1, Ailin C Rogers2, Veronica McSharry3
1Ireland East Hospital Gynaeoncology Group, Mater Misericordiae University, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Abstract:
Aim The aim of this meta-analysis is to review the morbidity and mortality associated with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery (NACT + ICS) for advanced ovarian cancer.
Methods:
A literature search was performed for publications reporting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing PCS compared to NACT + ICS. Databases searched were Cochrane, Medline, Pubmed, Pubmed Central, clinicaltrials.gov and Embase. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to select included papers, with differences agreed by consensus. A total of 1341 citations were reviewed; 17 studies comprising 3759 patients were selected for the analysis. The literature search was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results were reported as mean differences or pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Results:
Patients in the PCS group were significantly more likely to have a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 morbidity with an overall rate of 21.2% compared to 8.8% (95%CI 1.9-4.0, p < 0.0001) and were more likely to die within 30 days of surgery (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.1-17.6, p = 0.0008). Patients who underwent NACT + ICS had significantly shorter procedural times (MD -35 min, p = 0.01), lost less blood intraoperatively (MD-382 ml, p < 0.001) and had an average admission 5.0 days shorter (MD -5.0 days, 95% CI -8.1 to -1.9 days, p = 0.002) than those undergoing PCS. While NACT was associated with significantly increased optimal and complete cytoreduction rates (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9, p = 0.001, and OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.3, p = 0.0001 respectively), this did not confer any additional survival benefit (OR 1.0, p = 0.76).
Conclusion:
NACT is associated with less morbidity and mortality and improved complete cytoreduction compared to PCS, with no survival benefit. Hence NACT is an acceptable alternative in selected patients in particular with medical co-morbidities or a high tumour burden.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Ovarian Cycle

