Impact of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry experimental design on
Sarah E Prebihalo1, David K Pinkerton1, Robert E Synovec1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Box 351700, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Abstract:
Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS) is a powerful instrument for the analysis of complex samples. Deconvolution of overlapped analytes using a suitable chemometric data analysis method such as Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) is often required. However, PARAFAC is designed to require a strict data trilinearity requirement. In this study we examine how strict this requirement is in the context of GC × GC experimental conditions, and demonstrate that under suitable conditions the data is sufficiently trilinear to achieve accurate deconvolution. The term trilinear deviation ratio (TDR) was previously introduced as a quantitative metric to predict the accuracy of PARAFAC deconvolution. Trilinear deviation ratio is defined as the run-to-run retention time shift, Δ2tR, for a given analyte on the second dimension (2D) separation, divided by the 2D analyte peak width-at-base, 2Wb. We demonstrate that experimental conditions impact the TDR range produced and PARAFAC performance. Column selection and modulation period, PM, are shown to significantly influence the TDR range. Two column sets were evaluated, giving rise to different k' ranges for the 2D separations. Each column set was used with an optimum PM as well as a longer PM to demonstrate the effect of PM selection on the TDR range and PARAFAC quantification. A PM of 6 s produced a Δ2tR range from -19.5 ms to -98 ms and TDRs from 0.157 to 0.439, translating into a PARAFAC bias from +1.6% to -13.5%. However, a PM of 1.5 s produced a Δ2tR range of -1.1 ms to -8.8 ms, and significantly lower TDRs from 0.013 to 0.057, translating into PARAFAC errors from +2.1% to -3.9%, with an average of -1.1% ± 1.4. These results validate the idea that a suitable GC × GC experimental design will provide accurate quantification with PARAFAC.
More Related Videos
10:14Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 2, 2020
09:09Semi-Quantitative Analysis of Peptidoglycan by Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Bioinformatics
Published on: October 13, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Dimensional Analysis
Conversion Factors and Dimensional Analysis
The unit...
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
Applications of the Ideal Gas Law: Molar Mass, Density, and Volume
Experimental Designs
