Comparison of Nutrition Status as Assessed by Revised IAP 2015 Growth Charts and CDC 2000 Growth Charts in Lower

Sarala Premkumar1, Padmasani Venkatramanan2, J Dhivyalakshmi1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Insights

The Revised Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) 2015 growth charts identify more Indian children as overweight or obese compared to the CDC 2000 growth charts. Conversely, CDC 2000 charts indicate higher rates of stunting and thinness in this population.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Nutritional Science
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of child nutrition status is crucial for early intervention.
  • Different growth charts may yield varying prevalence rates for malnutrition and obesity.
  • Socioeconomic factors can influence nutritional status in school-aged children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the nutritional status of Indian school children using the Revised IAP 2015 and CDC 2000 growth charts.
  • To evaluate the agreement between these two widely used growth charting systems.
  • To determine the prevalence of overweight/obesity, thinness, and stunting based on each chart.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of anthropometric data from 4011 school children (ages 5-16) in Chennai.
  • Data retrieval from school health records, with measurements taken per standard guidelines.
  • Calculation of Z scores and assessment of inter-chart agreement using the kappa coefficient.

Main Results:

  • The IAP 2015 charts indicated a 12.2% prevalence of overweight/obesity, 9.8% thinness, and 9% stunting.
  • The CDC 2000 charts showed 7.3% overweight/obesity, 41.7% thinness, and 23% stunting.
  • Minimal agreement (kappa=0.314) for BMI-for-age and weak agreement (kappa=0.497) for height-for-age were observed.

Conclusions:

  • The Revised IAP 2015 growth charts identify a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity in Indian children compared to CDC 2000 charts.
  • The CDC 2000 growth charts identify a higher prevalence of stunting and thinness.
  • Discrepancies highlight the importance of selecting appropriate growth charts for accurate nutritional assessment in specific populations.

Related Concept Videos

Run Charts01:12

Run Charts

Run charts serve as an essential instrument for visualizing the performance of various processes over time, enabling the identification of trends and patterns crucial for quality improvement. These charts map out a series of data points chronologically, offering insights into the stability and efficiency of a process. A run chart's creation involves plotting data points on a graph, with the time intervals on the horizontal axis and the specific measurements on the vertical axis. For...
276
The R Chart01:02

The R Chart

In statistical process control, control charts, particularly R charts, are instrumental in monitoring process variations and identifying non-random patterns that run charts might miss. R charts track the variability within process subgroups, which is crucial when standard deviation use is impractical or unknown process variations exist.
R charts are pivotal for pinpointing shifts in process variability. Stability is indicated when all data points remain within the defined upper and lower...
382
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
343
Pareto Chart00:52

Pareto Chart

A Pareto chart is a bar graph or a combination of both line and bar graphs. The bar lengths represent the individual values or the frequency, while the lines represent the cumulative total values. In this chart, the longest bars are arranged on the left and the shortest bars on the right, which makes it easier to read and interpret the data. It can also be called a Pareto diagram or Pareto analysis.
The Pareto chart is named after the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who described the Pareto...
7.6K
Interpreting Run Charts01:25

Interpreting Run Charts

Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...
3.0K
The X̄ Chart00:58

The X̄ Chart

The  x̄ chart is a statistical tool for monitoring the means in a process.
The x̄ chart, often known as the individual control chart, is a crucial tool in statistical process control. It is designed to monitor process behavior and performance over time and is widely used in various industries to ensure that processes are operating at their optimum capacity and within specified limits.
A x̄ chart is constructed by plotting individual measurements of a quality...
454