Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Imprecise Kidney Function Thresholds in Cancer Clinical Trials and the Potential for Harm
Edwin Wang1, Jessica K Paulus2, Douglas Hackenyos3
1Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Abstract:
Current guidance for evaluation of kidney function and drug dosing emphasize using measured or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) rather than measured or estimated creatinine clearance or serum creatinine (Scr) alone. We assessed the definitions of kidney function thresholds for eligibility in cancer clinical trials. A random sample of active Phase I-III trials with cisplatin (n = 465) and studies in cancer with decreased kidney function (n = 74) were identified from clinicaltrials.gov. Among cisplatin trials, kidney function thresholds were defined by Scr alone or a composite of Scr or creatinine clearance in 46% (212/465) of studies. Only 2% (n = 11) used GFR. Among trials in participants with decreased kidney function, the proportion utilizing GFR (14%, 10/74) was modestly higher. Imprecise and logically inconsistent kidney function thresholds are in frequent use in clinical trials in cancer and may cause harm from either toxicity or impaired efficacy. We recommend the adoption and harmonization of recommended standards.
Insights
Cancer clinical trials frequently use inconsistent kidney function criteria, potentially harming patients. Current standards should be adopted to ensure accurate drug dosing and patient eligibility for cancer treatments.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Current medical guidelines recommend using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for assessing kidney function and guiding drug dosing.
- Serum creatinine (Scr) alone or creatinine clearance are often used but are less precise than GFR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the definitions of kidney function thresholds used for eligibility in cancer clinical trials.
- To identify the prevalence of GFR versus Scr or creatinine clearance in defining these thresholds.
Main Methods:
- A random sample of 465 active Phase I-III trials involving cisplatin and 74 studies in cancer patients with decreased kidney function were analyzed.
- Data were sourced from clinicaltrials.gov to assess defined kidney function criteria.
Main Results:
- Kidney function thresholds were defined by Scr alone or a composite including Scr or creatinine clearance in 46% of cisplatin trials.
- Only 2% of cisplatin trials and 14% of trials for decreased kidney function utilized GFR.
- A significant discrepancy exists in the methods used to define kidney function eligibility across cancer trials.
Conclusions:
- Imprecise and inconsistent kidney function thresholds are commonly used in cancer clinical trials.
- These inconsistent criteria may lead to patient harm through drug toxicity or reduced treatment efficacy.
- Adoption and harmonization of recommended GFR standards are crucial for improving cancer trial design and patient safety.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Kidney Structure

