Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Measuring Protein Stability in Living Zebrafish Embryos Using Fluorescence Decay After Photoconversion FDAP
Published on: January 28, 2015
Comparison of tri-exponential decay versus bi-exponential decay and full fitting versus segmented fitting for
Olivier Chevallier1,2, Nan Zhou3, Jean-Pierre Cercueil2
1Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Objectives:
To determine whether bi- or tri-exponential models, and full or segmented fittings, better fit the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging signal of healthy livers.
Methods:
Diffusion-weighted images were acquired with a 3 T scanner using a respiratory-triggered echo-planar sequence and 16 b-values (0-800 s/mm2 ). Eighteen healthy volunteers had their livers scanned twice in the same session, and then once in another session. Liver parenchyma region-of-interest-based measurements were processed with bi-exponential and tri-exponential models, with both full fitting and segmented fitting (threshold b-value = 200 s/mm2 ).
Results:
With the signal of all scans averaged, bi-exponential model full fitting showed Dslow = 1.14 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Dfast = 193.6 × 10-3 mm2 /s, and perfusion fraction (PF) = 16.9%, and segmented fitting showed Dslow = 0.98 × 10-3 mm2 /s, Dfast = 42.2 × 10-3 mm2 /s, and PF = 23.3%. IVIM parameters derived from the tri-exponential model were similar for full fitting and segmented fitting, with slow (D'slow = 0.98 × 10-3 mm2 /s; F'slow = 76.4 or 76.6%), fast (D'fast = 15.1 or 15.4 × 10-3 mm2 /s; F'fast = 11.8 or 11.7%) and very fast (D'Vfast = 445.0 or 448.8 × 10-3 mm2 /s; F'Vfast = 11.8 or 11.7%) diffusion compartments. The tri-exponential model provided an overall better fit than the bi-exponential model. For the bi-exponential model, full fitting provided a better fit at very low and low b-values compared with segmented fitting, with the latter tending to underestimate Dfast ; however, the segmented method demonstrated lower error in signal prediction for high b-values. Compared with full fitting, tri-exponential segmented fitting offered better scan-rescan reproducibility.
Conclusion:
For healthy liver, tri-exponential modeling is preferred to bi-exponential modeling. For the bi-exponential model, segmented fitting underestimates Dfast , but offers a more accurate estimation of Dslow .
Related Concept Videos
Radioactive Decay and Radiometric Dating
Induced-fit Model
Enzymes exhibit substrate specificity, meaning that they can only bind to certain substrates. This is mainly determined by the shape and chemical...
Exponential Growth
Exponential and Sinusoidal Signals
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

