Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Individuals on Individuals01:30

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

361
Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...
361
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

318
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
318
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

301
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
301
Adler's Individual Psychology01:28

Adler's Individual Psychology

2.3K
Alfred Adler, a prominent figure in psychology, founded the school of individual psychology. In contrast to Freud's emphasis on sexual or aggressive motives, Adler suggested that individuals are primarily motivated by their purposes and goals. He believed that people strive for perfection rather than pleasure. Adler argued that individuals could creatively act upon their genetic inheritance and environmental experiences to shape their own lives, emphasizing conscious motivation over...
2.3K
Dosage Regimen: Individualization01:24

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

171
Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...
171
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

285
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
285

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward the simultaneous detection of multiple diseases with a highly cost-effective cell-free DNA methylome test.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Characterizing the effects of noncontrast head CT reconstruction kernel and slice thickness parameters on the performance of an automated AI algorithm in the evaluation of ischemic stroke.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

SmokeBERT: A Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers-Based Model for Quantitative Smoking History Extraction From Clinical Narratives to Improve Lung Cancer Screening.

JCO clinical cancer informatics·2025
Same author

Robust software development practices improve citations of RNA-seq tools.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Influence of Mammography Acquisition Parameters on AI and Radiologist Interpretive Performance.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2025
Same author

Remote Patient Monitoring for Global Emergencies: Case Study in Patients With COVID-19.

JMIR formative research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Utilizing Functional Genomics Screening to Identify Potentially Novel Drug Targets in Cancer Cell Spheroid Cultures
07:48

Utilizing Functional Genomics Screening to Identify Potentially Novel Drug Targets in Cancer Cell Spheroid Cultures

Published on: December 26, 2016

11.8K

Generating Reward Functions Using IRL Towards Individualized Cancer Screening.

Panayiotis Petousis1, Simon X Han1, William Hsu1,2

  • 1UCLA Bioengineering Department, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Artificial Intelligence in Health : First International Workshop, AIH 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, July 13-14, 2018, Revised Selected Papers. AIH (Workshop) (1St : 2018 : Stockholm, Sweden)
|August 1, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Personalized cancer screening uses inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to create reward functions for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs). This approach matches expert physician decisions for lung and breast cancer screening, improving personalized care.

Keywords:
Cancer screeningMaximum entropy inverse reinforcement learningPartially-observable Markov decision processes

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.1K
Author Spotlight: Transmitochondrial Cybrid Generation Using Cancer Cell Lines
07:49

Author Spotlight: Transmitochondrial Cybrid Generation Using Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Utilizing Functional Genomics Screening to Identify Potentially Novel Drug Targets in Cancer Cell Spheroid Cultures
07:48

Utilizing Functional Genomics Screening to Identify Potentially Novel Drug Targets in Cancer Cell Spheroid Cultures

Published on: December 26, 2016

11.8K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

24.1K
Author Spotlight: Transmitochondrial Cybrid Generation Using Cancer Cell Lines
07:49

Author Spotlight: Transmitochondrial Cybrid Generation Using Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Cancer screening personalization is crucial to reduce overdiagnosis and accommodate participant heterogeneity.
  • Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) offer a framework for individualized screening policies but require accurate reward functions.
  • Defining appropriate reward functions for POMDPs in cancer screening remains a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate the use of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) for deriving reward functions in POMDP models for lung and breast cancer screening.
  • To develop personalized screening decision-making tools that align with expert clinical judgment.

Main Methods:

  • Employed maximum entropy (MaxEnt) IRL with an adaptive step size to learn reward functions efficiently.
  • Integrated a multiplicative model to learn state-action pair rewards for POMDPs.
  • Developed and evaluated two POMDP models for lung and breast cancer screening using retrospective physician decisions.

Main Results:

  • The IRL-derived reward functions, when integrated with POMDP models, yielded personalized screening recommendations comparable to expert physicians.
  • High agreement (Cohen's Kappa) was observed between POMDP recommendations and physician predictions for breast cancer screening.
  • A decreasing trend in agreement was noted for lung cancer screening, indicating areas for further refinement.

Conclusions:

  • Inverse reinforcement learning provides a viable method for creating effective reward functions for POMDP-based personalized cancer screening.
  • The developed POMDP models demonstrate the potential to support individualized screening decisions, achieving expert-level performance in certain contexts.
  • Further research may be needed to optimize IRL-POMDP models for lung cancer screening to fully match expert performance.