Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.8K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.8K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.8K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.8K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

569
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
569
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

461
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
461

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Cardiac Function Estimation from Phone Videos of Echocardiograms.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

SyntheMol-RL: a flexible reinforcement learning framework for designing easily synthesizable antibiotics.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same author

Reimagining human-centric drug development with new approach methodologies.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

A foundation generative model for breast ultrasound image analysis.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Generalist biological artificial intelligence in modeling the language of life.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

CellVoyager: AI CompBio agent generates new insights by autonomously analyzing biological data.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Large-scale discovery and annotation of substructure patterns in mass spectrometry profiles.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Salmonella SopB suppresses post-transcriptionally regulated cytokine release to reduce early tissue inflammation and delay disease progression.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

A human-specific microRNA controls the timing of excitatory synaptogenesis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

An HMA-like integrated domain in the wheat tandem kinase WTK4 recognises an RNase-like pathogen effector.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Learning regularities in noise engages both neural predictive activity and representational changes.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

The H3K4 methyltransferase KMT2D is an essential cofactor for GATA1 at erythroid gene enhancers.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.3K

Fast and covariate-adaptive method amplifies detection power in large-scale multiple hypothesis testing.

Martin J Zhang1, Fei Xia1, James Zou2,3,4

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Palo Alto, 94304, USA.

Nature Communications
|August 2, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

AdaFDR adaptively learns optimal p-value thresholds from covariates, significantly improving detection power in multiple hypothesis testing. This method discovers more associations than traditional approaches while controlling the false discovery rate.

More Related Videos

Power Input Measurements in Stirred Bioreactors at Laboratory Scale
10:49

Power Input Measurements in Stirred Bioreactors at Laboratory Scale

Published on: May 16, 2018

18.5K
A Tissue Clearing Method for Neuronal Imaging from Mesoscopic to Microscopic Scales
07:20

A Tissue Clearing Method for Neuronal Imaging from Mesoscopic to Microscopic Scales

Published on: May 10, 2022

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.3K
Power Input Measurements in Stirred Bioreactors at Laboratory Scale
10:49

Power Input Measurements in Stirred Bioreactors at Laboratory Scale

Published on: May 16, 2018

18.5K
A Tissue Clearing Method for Neuronal Imaging from Mesoscopic to Microscopic Scales
07:20

A Tissue Clearing Method for Neuronal Imaging from Mesoscopic to Microscopic Scales

Published on: May 10, 2022

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational biology

Background:

  • Multiple hypothesis testing is crucial in data science, especially when covariates like variant annotations are available.
  • Existing methods, such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (BH), often ignore valuable covariate information.
  • This leads to missed discoveries and reduced statistical power in complex analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce AdaFDR, a novel method for multiple hypothesis testing that leverages covariates.
  • Enhance detection power by adaptively learning optimal p-value thresholds.
  • Provide a computationally efficient and flexible tool for broad scientific applications.

Main Methods:

  • AdaFDR adaptively learns p-value thresholds using multi-dimensional covariates (numeric and categorical).
  • The method is designed to control the false discovery rate (FDR) and false discovery proportion.
  • Theoretical guarantees for FDR control are provided.

Main Results:

  • AdaFDR discovered 32% more associations than the BH procedure in eQTL analysis of GTEx data at the same FDR.
  • Extensive experiments demonstrate AdaFDR's ability to make substantially more discoveries while maintaining FDR control.
  • The method proved computationally efficient and robust across various datasets.

Conclusions:

  • AdaFDR significantly improves detection power in multiple hypothesis testing by incorporating covariate information.
  • The method offers a powerful and flexible alternative to existing procedures, applicable across diverse scientific fields.
  • AdaFDR provides a computationally efficient solution for maximizing discoveries while controlling error rates.