Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.0K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K
Dynamic Equilibrium02:20

Dynamic Equilibrium

61.9K
A reversible chemical reaction represents a chemical process that proceeds in both forward (left to right) and reverse (right to left) directions. When the rates of the forward and reverse reactions are equal, the concentrations of the reactant and product species remain constant over time and the system is at equilibrium. A special double arrow is used to emphasize the reversible nature of the reaction. The relative concentrations of reactants and products in equilibrium systems vary greatly;...
61.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic dynamics. I. Derivation of the theory.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

A partially linearized spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic dynamics. II. Analysis and comparison with related approaches.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

Instanton theory of tunneling in molecules with asymmetric isotopic substitutions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

Semiclassical instanton formulation of Marcus-Levich-Jortner theory.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

Generalized spin mapping for quantum-classical dynamics.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same author

Instanton formulation of Fermi's golden rule in the Marcus inverted regime.

The Journal of chemical physics·2020
Same journal

Revisiting crossed-correlated baths in open quantum systems simulated by HEOM or T-TEDOPA.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Vesicle size and membrane composition control monomer transfer pathways in multicomponent lipid vesicles.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Polaron-mediated exciton dynamics of P(NDI2OD-T2) unveiled by transient absorption spectroscopy under electrochemical conditions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Green-Kubo relation in a mesoscale odd fluid model.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Nitrogenation of microscopic MoS2 surfaces by oxidation scanning probe lithography.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same journal

Molecular structure, binding, and disorder in TDBC-Ag plexcitonic assemblies.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.5K

Spin-mapping approach for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics.

Johan E Runeson1, Jeremy O Richardson1

  • 1Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|August 3, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We present a new trajectory-based method for simulating nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. This approach offers improved accuracy over existing methods for two coupled electronic states without increased computational cost.

More Related Videos

Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping
09:40

Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping

Published on: August 26, 2010

22.7K
Measurement of Microtubule Dynamics by Spinning Disk Microscopy in Monopolar Mitotic Spindles
08:31

Measurement of Microtubule Dynamics by Spinning Disk Microscopy in Monopolar Mitotic Spindles

Published on: November 15, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.5K
Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping
09:40

Electron Spin Resonance Micro-imaging of Live Species for Oxygen Mapping

Published on: August 26, 2010

22.7K
Measurement of Microtubule Dynamics by Spinning Disk Microscopy in Monopolar Mitotic Spindles
08:31

Measurement of Microtubule Dynamics by Spinning Disk Microscopy in Monopolar Mitotic Spindles

Published on: November 15, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Chemical Physics
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Simulating nonadiabatic dynamics is crucial for understanding molecular systems.
  • Existing methods like Ehrenfest dynamics and Meyer-Miller-Stock-Thoss (MMST) mapping have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel trajectory-based method for simulating nonadiabatic dynamics.
  • To accurately model systems with two coupled electronic states.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a quantum-mechanically exact mapping of a two-level problem to a spin-1/2 coherent state.
  • Employed the Stratonovich-Weyl transform to create a classical phase space.
  • Applied a quasiclassical approximation to the derived dynamics.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method shows significant improvement over standard Ehrenfest dynamics and linearized semiclassical MMST mapping.
  • The dynamics generated are equivalent to the MMST Hamiltonian under quasiclassical approximation.
  • Achieved better accuracy without additional computational complexity.

Conclusions:

  • The new trajectory-based method provides a more accurate and computationally efficient approach for nonadiabatic dynamics.
  • This method offers a valuable alternative for simulating complex molecular systems with coupled electronic states.