Related Experiment Videos
Effects of adding a Medex on practice costs and productivity
Journal of Community Health
|January 1, 1978
Summary
Employing a physician assistant, or Medex, did not alter patient volume in rural practices. However, practices hiring a Medex saw increased revenue and physician net profit, indicating a positive financial impact.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Medical Economics
- Rural Health
Background:
- Rural healthcare practices face unique challenges in patient volume and financial stability.
- The role of advanced practice providers, such as physician assistants (Medex), is evolving in primary care settings.
- Assessing the financial impact of employing additional healthcare professionals is crucial for practice sustainability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of employing a Medex on patient volume in rural practices.
- To determine the financial effects of Medex employment on practice revenue and physician net profit.
Main Methods:
- Archival data from ten rural practices employing a Medex were compared to ten matched control practices.
- Patient volume and financial data (revenue, net profit) were analyzed before and after Medex employment.
- Statistical comparison was performed between the Medex-employing group and the control group.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in the changes in patient volume between practices with and without a Medex.
- Practices employing a Medex demonstrated a statistically significant increase in revenue compared to controls.
- Physicians in practices with a Medex experienced a greater average increase in net profit ($11,000, 22%) than control physicians ($9,000, 21%).
Conclusions:
- Employing a Medex in rural practices does not negatively impact patient volume.
- Hiring a Medex can lead to improved financial performance, including increased revenue and physician net profit.
- Medex integration represents a potentially valuable strategy for enhancing the financial viability of rural healthcare settings.