Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting:...

Post-dilation with kissing balloon dilation remains controversial in the 1-stent approach, but many technical improvements are possible to refine the final results. This study aimed to evaluate the results of different side-branch (SB) ostial treatments after main vessel stenting, including ostial optimization technique (OOT), simultaneous kissing balloon dilation (KBD) and single balloon dilation (SBD).

Three different ostial side branch treatments (OOT, n = 6; KBD, n = 6; SBD, n = 6) were emulated in a synthetic bifurcated phantom using a second-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Firebird2TM, Microport, Shanghai, China). Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed to assess morphologies.

Compared to the non-OOT procedures (SBD and KBD), OOT was characterized by the sequential dilation of two snuggling balloons, creating a longer valgus struts length (OOT: 2.13 ± 0.30 mm, SBD: 1.23 ± 0.34 mm, KBD: 1.11 ± 0.39 mm, p < 0.01), broader angulation between the main-branch and valgus struts axes (OOT: 42.72 ± 0.91°, SBD: 25.77 ± 7.81°, KBD: 31.78 ± 1.34°, p < 0.01), shorter neocarina length (OOT: 0.28 ± 0.31 mm, SBD: 0.64 ± 0.38 mm, KBD: 1.11 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.01), larger SB ostial area (OOT: 6.76 ± 0.17 mm², SBD: 4.78 ± 0.86 mm², KBD: 5.87 ± 0.89 mm², p < 0.01), and lower index of stent cell distortion (OOT: 6.67 ± 3.33%, SBD: 10.67 ± 4.23%, KBD: 20.00 ± 5.29%, p < 0.01). In addition, the rate of severe strut malapposition was lower with the OOT procedure compared with the non-OOT procedures (OOT: 2.22 ± 0.48%, SBD: 10.31 ± 0.66%, KBD: 6.74 ± 1.24%, p < 0.01).

OOT, consisting of an initial proximal optimizing technique (POT) and sequential snuggling balloon dilation and then re-POT, significantly optimized the results of provisional bifurcation treatment. The physiological and clinical significance of our observations await further clarification.