Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Echocardiographic Characterization of Left Ventricular Structure, Function, and Coronary Flow in Neonate Mice
Published on: April 7, 2022
The impact of the coronary sinus reducer upon left ventricular function in patients with refractory angina pectoris
Georgios Tzanis1, Anna Palmisano2, Guglielmo Gallone1
1Unit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Insights
Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced volumes in patients with refractory angina. These improvements were more pronounced in patients with reduced ejection fraction, suggesting enhanced myocardial perfusion.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation is established for symptomatic relief in refractory angina.
- The impact of CS Reducer on left ventricular (LV) function remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effects of CS Reducer implantation on left ventricular (LV) function and myocardial perfusion.
Main Methods:
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was used to assess LV volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) pre- and post-implantation.
- Stress CMR was performed to measure myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI).
Main Results:
- Successful Reducer implantation in 19 patients led to significant improvements in LVEF and reductions in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes.
- Patients with reduced baseline LVEF (<50%) showed a greater increase in LVEF and a more substantial decrease in LV end-systolic volume.
- A significant increase in transmural MPRI was observed 4 months post-implantation.
Conclusions:
- CS Reducer implantation improves LV function and reduces adverse LV remodeling in patients with refractory angina.
- The benefits are more pronounced in patients with pre-existing reduced ejection fraction.
- Enhanced myocardial perfusion may underlie the observed functional improvements.
Objectives:
To evaluate the impact of coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation upon left ventricular (LV) function.
Background:
CS Reducer implantation is associated with symptomatic relief in patients with refractory angina. The effects of the device upon left ventricular function remains unknown.
Methods:
Prior to device implantation and at 4-months, resting ventricular volumes and function were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Stress CMR was performed to extract quantitative indices of myocardial perfusion (myocardial perfusion reserve index-MPRI).
Results:
Nineteen patients (18 males, 66.0 [IQR 56.0-77.0] years), underwent successful Reducer implantation. Sixteen (84%) patients improved by at least 1 CCS class. Four months after Reducer implantation, we noticed a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (61 [IQR 47-71] to 66 [IQR 57-72] %; p = .009), a reduction in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)/Body surface area (BSA) (65.7 [IQR 57.4-89.6] to 64.7 [IQR 53.7-74.1] mL/m2 ; p = .036) and a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)/BSA (28.7 [IQR 18.6-38.8] to 20.0 [IQR 15.0-31.4] mL/m2 ; p = .007). Patients with reduced EF (EF < 50%, n = 6) presented a greater increase of EF at follow up compared to patients with preserved EF (11.3 [IQR 6.5-54.5] vs. 3.8 [IQR 0.6-9.1] %; p = .029). The observed decrease in LVESV/BSA was greater in patients with reduced EF (23.6 [IQR 11.6-33.8] vs. 4.2 [IQR -2.0 to 8.4] mL/m2 ; p = .005). A significant increase in transmural MPRI was observed 4 months after Reducer implantation (p < .011).
Conclusions:
CS Reducer improved angina symptoms and improved left ventricular function. The improvement was pronounced in the subgroup of patients with reduced ejection fraction. Myocardial perfusion improvement could represent the underlying mechanism for the observed benefits.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Angina I: Introduction
Angina II: Classification
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Impact of Groups on Groups