Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Gene Transfer for Ischemic Heart Failure in a Preclinical Model
Published on: May 15, 2011
Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial: A review of outcomes
Ali Fatehi Hassanabad1, Kelsey T MacQueen1, Imtiaz Ali1
1Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Insights
Coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction benefit long-term from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) plus optimal medical therapy (OMT). Adding surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) to CABG showed no additional benefit over CABG alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death globally.
- Severe left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 35%) in CAD patients presents significant management challenges.
- The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial addressed critical questions in this patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and synthesize data from the STICH trial and its sub-studies.
- To provide a balanced assessment of the trial's findings and subsequent criticisms.
- To inform evidence-based clinical decision-making for ischemic heart failure.
Main Methods:
- The STICH trial investigated two primary hypotheses regarding surgical intervention for ischemic heart failure.
- Hypothesis 1: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) + optimal medical therapy (OMT) vs. OMT alone.
- Hypothesis 2: CABG + surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) vs. CABG alone.
Main Results:
- Ten-year follow-up demonstrated significant long-term survival benefits for CABG + OMT compared to OMT alone.
- No significant difference in outcomes was observed between CABG + SVR and CABG alone.
- Subanalyses have provided further insights and sparked ongoing debate.
Conclusions:
- CABG in addition to OMT offers long-term benefits for patients with severe LV dysfunction and CAD.
- SVR as an adjunct to CABG did not provide additional survival advantages in the STICH trial.
- The STICH trial has significantly influenced, and at times challenged, established treatment paradigms for ischemic heart failure.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The landmark Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial has provided greatly needed evidence in the management of patients with severe left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 35%) and CAD amenable to revascularization. The trial investigated two primary hypotheses: (i) that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with optimal medical therapy (OMT) was superior to OMT alone, and (ii) that CABG with surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) would be superior to CABG alone. The results of the 10-year follow-up demonstrated significant long-term benefits with the addition of CABG to OMT. However, the second hypothesis yielded controversial results as the study found no difference between CABG with SVR and SVR alone. The STICH trial, and the numerous subanalyses that followed have reinforced and challenged a number of widely held beliefs regarding the management of patients with severe LV dysfunction and ischemic heart failure. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to outline the published data from the STICH trial and its substudies while providing a balanced assessment of the evidence-based conclusions and criticisms that have followed.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

