Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

11.1K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
11.1K
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex01:23

Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex

2.4K
The somatosensory cortex in the parietal lobes is crucial for interpreting sensory data such as touch, temperature, and proprioception. The somatosensory cortex, situated in the parietal lobes, plays a vital role in interpreting sensory information like touch, temperature, and proprioception—awareness of body position. This specialized brain region features an organized structure wherein neurons at the top primarily process sensations originating from the lower body. In contrast, those at...
2.4K
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence01:26

Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence

1.3K
Fluorescence and phosphorescence are essential phenomena in fields like analytical chemistry, biological imaging, and materials science, where they detect molecular properties and visualize cellular structures. Understanding the variables that influence these luminescent behaviors is crucial for maximizing accuracy and efficiency in their applications. These variables can broadly be grouped into chemical structure, solvent properties, and external conditions, each playing a distinct role in...
1.3K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

450
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
450
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.5K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.5K
Work and Energy for Variable Forces01:10

Work and Energy for Variable Forces

5.7K
When an object is acted upon by a variable force, the amount of work done and the change in energy of the object can be more complex to calculate compared to when a constant force is applied. Work is the product of force and displacement, while energy is the capacity of a system to do work. When a constant force is applied to an object, the work done can be calculated as the product of the force and the distance moved in the direction of the force. However, when a variable force is applied, the...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterizing persistent Post-COVID-19 vaccination symptoms using MedDRA system organ class and preferred term classifications.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Perampanel Blocks Transsynaptic α-Synuclein Propagation and Neurodegeneration in a Mouse Model of Lewy Body Disease.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2026
Same author

Impact of α-synuclein fibril structure on seeding activity in experimental models of Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2025
Same author

High-accuracy spinal alignment monitoring using the head angle and visual distance in computer users.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The Gut-Brain Axis Based on α-Synuclein Propagation-Clinical, Neuropathological, and Experimental Evidence.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Characteristics of Trunk Acceleration and Angular Velocity in Turning Movement in Post-Stroke Patients with High Risk of Falling.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.4K

Automated Variable Stimulus Tendon Tapping Modulates Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.

Waiman Meinhold, Shin-Ichi Izumi, Jun Ueda

    IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [Proceedings]
    |August 4, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Automating tendon tapping for Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) significantly reduces variability in timing and intensity compared to manual methods. This automated approach allows for precise control of stimulation intensity, revealing its impact on SSEP amplitude.

    More Related Videos

    Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
    06:56

    Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

    Published on: December 18, 2015

    13.8K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

    Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
    09:42

    Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

    Published on: May 12, 2019

    6.4K
    Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
    06:56

    Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

    Published on: December 18, 2015

    13.8K
    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
    19:44

    A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

    Published on: June 3, 2009

    14.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Physiology

    Background:

    • Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) are crucial in neuroscience and therapeutic evaluation.
    • Existing research primarily focuses on electrically induced SSEPs, with less attention to stretch response SSEPs via tendon tapping.
    • Consistent timing and stimulation intensity are critical for accurate SSEP measurement.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate a novel automated tapping device for evoking SSEPs.
    • To compare the consistency of automated tendon tapping against manual methods.
    • To investigate the relationship between stimulation intensity and SSEP amplitude using the automated device.

    Main Methods:

    • Development and testing of a simple automated tapping device for tendon stimulation.
    • Comparative analysis of timing and intensity variability between automated and manual tapping.
    • Measurement of SSEPs in a single subject using the automated tapper with variable intensity settings.

    Main Results:

    • The automated tapping device demonstrated significantly reduced variability in both timing and intensity compared to manual tapping.
    • Automated tapping provides consistent and controllable stimulation intensity.
    • Variable stimulation intensity from the automated tapper appeared to modulate the peak-peak amplitude of the measured SSEPs.

    Conclusions:

    • Automated tendon tapping offers a more reliable and consistent method for evoking SSEPs than manual tapping.
    • The developed device facilitates precise control over stimulation parameters, crucial for SSEP research.
    • This automated approach enables further investigation into intensity-dependent SSEP modulation and its physiological implications.