Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring Salidroside's Molecular Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Treatment
Published on: June 9, 2023
Sprouty3 and Sprouty4, Two Members of a Family Known to Inhibit FGF-Mediated Signaling, Exert Opposing Roles on
Burcu Emine Celik-Selvi1, Astrid Stütz1, Christoph-Erik Mayer1
1Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
Dysregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase-induced pathways is a critical step driving the oncogenic potential of brain cancer. In this study, we investigated the role of two members of the Sprouty (Spry) family in brain cancer-derived cell lines. Using immunoblot analyses we found essential differences in the pattern of endogenous Spry3 and Spry4 expression. While Spry4 expression was mitogen-dependent and repressed in a number of cells from higher malignant brain cancers, Spry3 levels neither fluctuated in response to serum withdrawal nor were repressed in glioblastoma (GBM)-derived cell lines. In accordance to the well-known inhibitory role of Spry proteins in fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-mediated signaling, both Spry proteins were able to interfere with FGF-induced activation of the MAPK pathway although to a different extent. In response to serum solely, Spry4 exerts its role as a negative regulator of MAPK activation. Ectopic expression of Spry4 inhibited proliferation and migration of GBM-originated cells, positioning it as a tumor suppressor in brain cancer. In contrast, elevated Spry3 levels accelerated both proliferation and migration of these cell lines, while repression of Spry3 levels using shRNA caused a significant diminished growth and migration velocity rate of a GBM-derived cell line. This argues for a tumor-promoting function of Spry3 in GBMs. Based on these data we conclude that Spry3 and Spry4 fulfill different if not opposing roles within the cancerogenesis of brain malignancies.
Insights
Sprouty (Spry) proteins Spry3 and Spry4 have opposing roles in brain cancer. Spry4 acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting growth and migration, while Spry3 promotes these processes in glioblastoma.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Signaling
Background:
- Receptor tyrosine kinase pathway dysregulation drives brain cancer oncogenesis.
- Sprouty (Spry) proteins are negative regulators of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.
- Understanding Spry protein function in brain tumors is crucial for therapeutic development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the distinct roles of Spry3 and Spry4 in brain cancer cell lines.
- To elucidate the impact of Spry proteins on glioblastoma (GBM) proliferation and migration.
- To determine the potential of Spry proteins as therapeutic targets in brain malignancies.
Main Methods:
- Immunoblot analysis to assess endogenous Spry3 and Spry4 expression patterns.
- Investigation of Spry protein interaction with fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-mediated signaling.
- Functional assays including ectopic expression and shRNA-mediated repression to evaluate effects on cell proliferation and migration.
Main Results:
- Spry4 expression is mitogen-dependent and downregulated in high-grade brain cancers, acting as a negative regulator of MAPK activation.
- Spry4 overexpression inhibited GBM cell proliferation and migration, indicating a tumor-suppressive role.
- Spry3 overexpression enhanced GBM cell proliferation and migration, while its repression significantly reduced these processes, suggesting a tumor-promoting function.
Conclusions:
- Spry3 and Spry4 exhibit opposing functions in brain cancer development and progression.
- Spry4 acts as a tumor suppressor, whereas Spry3 functions as an oncoprotein in glioblastoma.
- Targeting Spry3 or Spry4 may offer novel therapeutic strategies for brain cancer treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Role of Myosin in Cell Migration
Myosin II is a hexamer comprising two heavy chains with globular heads and coiled-coil tails, two regulatory light chains, and two essential light chains. The ATPase sites on the myosin heads hydrolyze ATP, and the released phosphate generates the force for contraction....
Gene Families
Occasionally these regions can be adapted to take on new roles within the organism, becoming novel genes...
Protein Families
Role Of Notch Signalling In Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal
Direct cell-to-cell contact is needed for the activation of Notch signaling. The signal is initiated when a notch ligand binds to a receptor on an adjacent cell, also...
Role of Ephrin-Eph Signalling in Intestinal Stem Cell Renewal
What is Cell Signaling?

