Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Surgical Turndown: "What's in a Name?" for Patients Deemed Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization
Hung Q Ly1, Mohamed Nosair1, Raymond Cartier2
1Interventional Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Montréal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Insights
Managing patients with severe ischemic heart disease (SIHD) ineligible for surgery, termed surgical turndown, presents challenges. A comprehensive Heart Team approach is crucial for optimal revascularization and improved outcomes in this growing patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Severe ischemic heart disease (SIHD) management is guided by clinical guidelines.
- An aging population and increasing comorbidities lead to a rise in SIHD patients ineligible for surgical revascularization (surgical turndown).
- Surgical turndown status is linked to poorer clinical outcomes and adverse prognostic implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the significance of the surgical turndown diagnosis in SIHD.
- To analyze the impact of surgical turndown on clinical outcomes.
- To identify key factors for revascularization decision-making in this patient subgroup.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical guidelines and literature concerning SIHD management.
- Analysis of prognostic implications associated with surgical turndown.
- Discussion of factors influencing revascularization suitability, including frailty and completeness of revascularization.
- Emphasis on the integrated Heart Team approach for patient-centered care.
Main Results:
- Surgical turndown patients face worse clinical outcomes compared to those eligible for surgery.
- Frailty and the potential for complete revascularization are critical considerations in decision-making.
- The Heart Team approach facilitates comprehensive assessment and tailored treatment strategies.
Conclusions:
- Accurate diagnosis and assessment of surgical turndowns are paramount in SIHD.
- An integrated Heart Team is essential for optimizing revascularization strategies in complex SIHD patients.
- Careful consideration of patient-specific factors is vital for improving outcomes in surgical turndown patients.
Abstract:
Optimal revascularization in severe ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is addressed in all clinical guidelines. With an aging patient population, a growing challenge remains the management of patients with SIHD deemed ineligible for surgical revascularization, the so-called surgical turndown patient. The status of surgical ineligibility remains associated with worse clinical outcomes. As the general population grows older and comorbidities increase, this subset of SIHD will likely increase. Ascribing the label of surgical turndown has significant adverse prognostic implications, and thus, careful assessment is required as key issues related to frailty and completeness of revascularization need to be taken into consideration in the decision-making process. Clearly defining criteria for surgical turndowns are paramount, as well as a comprehensive assessment of revascularization suitability. As such, an integrated Heart Team represents the favoured path forward to ensure patient-centred cardiovascular care. The Heart Team approach can appropriately manage issues related to revascularization in patients with SIHD with multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the focus of this review will be on the importance of the diagnosis of surgical turndown, its impact on clinical outcomes, and factors to bear in mind when considering revascularization in this challenging patient subgroup.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

