Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

"Will you complete this survey too?" Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research.

Allen W Barton1, Justin A Lavner2, Scott M Stanley3

  • 1Center for Family Research, University of Georgia.

Journal of Family Psychology : JFP : Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)
|August 6, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolving together: Dynamic transactions of antagonistic and self-centered traits with couple relationships.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

L-type pyocins inhibit the BAM complex to kill without cell entry.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Scaling up polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography to image the whole macaque brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Family expectations reduce the risk of postpartum depression among mothers but not fathers.

Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)·2026
Same author

Motor evoked potentials as markers of internal capsule current spread during deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Prefrontal cortical pathways mediating cognitive control enhancement from internal capsule stimulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Collecting data from couples in relationship research yields higher well-being reports than individual data. Partner participation significantly influences study outcomes and sample characteristics in romantic relationship research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Relationship Science

Background:

  • Research on romantic relationships often involves collecting data from individuals.
  • The method of data collection (individual vs. couple) may influence sample characteristics.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate research findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how collecting data from individuals versus couples impacts sample characteristics in romantic relationship research.
  • To compare relationship, individual, and demographic traits across different data collection conditions.
  • To inform best practices in designing relationship studies.

Main Methods:

  • A nationally representative sample of 1,294 individuals in serious romantic relationships was used.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants were randomly assigned to either invite their partner or not.
  • Three groups were compared: partners participated, partners did not participate, and partners were not invited.

    • Main Results:

    • Individuals whose partners participated reported higher relationship and individual well-being.
    • Individuals who participated alone (despite being asked to invite partner) reported the lowest well-being.
    • The most significant differences were observed in relationship variables like satisfaction and stability.

    Conclusions:

    • Partner participation in romantic relationship research significantly affects reported well-being and sample composition.
    • Study design choices, specifically regarding partner involvement, have substantial implications for research outcomes.
    • Researchers should carefully consider dyadic versus individual data collection methods.