Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Modeling Spontaneous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma mRCC in Mice Following Nephrectomy
Published on: April 29, 2014
MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: from the Early Descriptions to the Current Knowledge
Anna Caliò1, Diego Segala2, Enrico Munari3
1Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy.
Abstract:
The new category of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma has been included into the World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2016. The MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma comprises Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma harboring TFE3 gene fusions and t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma harboring TFEB gene fusion. At the beginning, they were recognized in childhood; nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that these neoplasms can occur in adults as well. In the nineties, among Xp11 renal cell carcinoma, ASPL, PRCC, and SFPQ (PSF) were the first genes recognized as partners in TFE3 rearrangement. Recently, many other genes have been identified, and a wide spectrum of morphologies has been described. For this reason, the diagnosis may be challenging based on the histology, and the differential diagnosis includes the most common renal cell neoplasms and pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney. During the last decades, many efforts have been made to identify immunohistochemical markers to reach the right diagnosis. To date, staining for PAX8, cathepsin K, and melanogenesis markers are the most useful identifiers. However, the diagnosis requires the demonstration of the chromosomal rearrangement, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the gold standard. The outcome of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma is highly variable, with some patients surviving decades with indolent disease and others dying rapidly of progressive disease. Despite most instances of t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma having an indolent clinical course, a few published cases demonstrate aggressive behavior. Recently, renal cell carcinomas with TFEB amplification have been described in connection with t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma. Those tumors appear to be associated with a more aggressive clinical course. For the aggressive cases of MiT family translocation carcinoma, the optimal therapy remains to be determined; however, new target therapies seem to be promising, and the search for predictive markers is mandatory.
Insights
MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas, including Xp11 and t(6;11) types, present diagnostic challenges. Identifying gene fusions and chromosomal rearrangements is crucial for accurate diagnosis and understanding variable patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Pathology
Background:
- MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a distinct entity classified by the WHO in 2016.
- This category includes Xp11 RCC with TFE3 gene fusions and t(6;11) RCC with TFEB gene fusion, occurring in both children and adults.
- Numerous gene partners for TFE3 rearrangements have been identified, leading to diverse morphologies and diagnostic complexities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the diagnostic challenges and evolving understanding of MiT family translocation RCC.
- To highlight key diagnostic markers and methods, including immunohistochemistry and FISH.
- To discuss the variable clinical outcomes and emerging therapeutic strategies for these rare tumors.
Main Methods:
- Histopathological review of MiT family translocation RCC cases.
- Analysis of immunohistochemical markers (PAX8, cathepsin K, melanogenesis markers).
- Application of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting chromosomal rearrangements.
Main Results:
- MiT family translocation RCC diagnosis can be challenging due to varied histology, requiring differentiation from other renal neoplasms.
- PAX8, cathepsin K, and melanogenesis markers are valuable immunohistochemical identifiers.
- FISH is the gold standard for confirming chromosomal rearrangements, essential for definitive diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- Accurate diagnosis of MiT family translocation RCC relies on integrating histology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic analysis (FISH).
- Xp11 RCC exhibits highly variable outcomes, while t(6;11) RCC generally follows an indolent course, though aggressive cases and TFEB amplification are noted.
- Further research into predictive markers and targeted therapies is crucial for managing aggressive MiT family translocation RCC.
More Related Videos
05:36Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020
06:38A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Gene Families
Occasionally these regions can be adapted to take on new roles within the organism, becoming novel genes...
Gene Families
Protein Families
Protein Families
Family Therapy
Strategic Family Therapy
Strategic family therapy emphasizes resolving communication barriers and improving problem-solving abilities...
Pleural Disorders: Types and Brief Description