Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
Multicenter retrospective comparison of spontaneous intestinal perforation outcomes between primary peritoneal drain
Samantha Ahle1, Faidah Badru2, Rachelle Damle3
1Section of Pediatric Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine/Yale-New haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Insights
Primary peritoneal drain is a successful treatment for spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) in infants, showing similar outcomes to laparotomy. While some cases require conversion to laparotomy, drain treatment offers comparable results for most infants with SIP.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal surgery
- Pediatric surgery
- Gastrointestinal surgery
Background:
- Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) is a critical surgical emergency in neonates.
- Treatment options for SIP include primary peritoneal drain and laparotomy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of infants with SIP treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy.
Main Methods:
- Multi-institution retrospective review of 171 infants diagnosed with SIP between 2012 and 2016.
- Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain (n=110) and primary laparotomy (n=61).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay, or mortality between the groups.
- Patients treated with primary drain were more premature and had lower birth weights.
- 29% of primary drain cases ultimately required laparotomy due to failure.
Conclusions:
- Primary peritoneal drain is a successful initial treatment for the majority of infants with SIP.
- Outcomes are comparable between primary drain and laparotomy, with drain treatment avoiding stoma formation in most cases.
Purpose:
The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy.
Methods:
We performed a multi-institution retrospective review of infants with diagnosis of SIP from 2012 to 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain vs infants treated with laparotomy.
Results:
We identified 171 patients treated for SIP (drain n = 110 vs. laparotomy n = 61). There were no differences in maternal or prenatal characteristics. There were no clinically significant differences in vital signs, white blood cell or platelet measures, up to 48 h after intervention. Patients who were treated primarily with a drain were more premature (24.9 vs. 27.2 weeks, p < 0.001) and had lower median birth weight (710 g vs. 896 g, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay (LOS) or mortality between the groups. Primary laparotomy group had more procedures (median number 1 vs. 2, p = 0.002). There were 32 (29%) primary drain failures whereby a laparotomy was ultimately needed.
Conclusions:
SIP treated with primary drain is successful in the majority of patients with no significant differences in outcomes when compared to laparotomy with stoma.
The Level Of Evidence:
III.
Related Concept Videos
Primary Active Transport
Primary Active Transport
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
Primary Distribution
Primary Production
Spontaneity

