Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
Assessing the impact of delayed blastulation using time lapse morphokinetics and preimplantation genetic testing in
Dana Kimelman1, Rafael Confino2, Ijeoma Okeigwe2
1Division of Reproductive Science in Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Purpose:
There is clinical evidence that early cleavage timing parameters predictive of blastocyst development also correlate with embryo implantation potential. The aim of this study is to determine the developmental competency of embryos with delayed blastulation.
Methods:
Retrospective study performed from 2015 to 2016 at the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at Northwestern University.
Results:
A total of 2,292 embryos from 524 patients were included. Day 6 blastocysts had statistically significant longer times for every time point analyzed than day 5 blastocysts (p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant difference in euploidy rates between day 5 (44%) and day 6 (41%) embryos (p = 0.573). t7 and t8 time points were independent predictors of euploidy after controlling for day of biopsy (p < 0.015 and p < 0.014, respectively). Intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and live birth (LB) were less likely to occur after transferring day 6 embryos (p = 0.0033 and p = 0.0359) without previous genetic testing. However, in embryos that undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), there were no significant differences in IUP or LB rates.
Conclusion:
Early time-lapse points can be used to predict embryo development. Day of blastulation may be an independent predictor IUP, with day 6 blastocysts having lower pregnancy and live birth rates. Our data suggests that day 5 and day 6 PGT-A tested embryos show similar rates of euploidy, suggesting that differences in PR seen in the non-PGT-A tested group may be caused by factors other than aneuploidy. Genetic testing technologies in combination with time-lapse microscopy may provide further information to improve IVF outcomes.
More Related Videos
13:13Time-Lapse Imaging of Neuronal Arborization using Sparse Adeno-Associated Virus Labeling of Genetically Targeted Retinal Cell Populations
Published on: March 19, 2021
08:06Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
What is Population Genetics?
Cleavage and Blastulation
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Conservation of Small Populations