Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Transplantation of Zebrafish Pediatric Brain Tumors into Immune-competent Hosts for Long-term Study of Tumor Cell Behavior and Drug Response
Published on: May 17, 2017
Feasibility and efficacy of an extended trial of home-based working memory training for pediatric brain tumor
Bonnie Carlson-Green1, Jennifer Puig1, Anne Bendel1
1Psychological Services (B.C.-G), Cancer and Blood Disorders Clinic at Children's of Minnesota, Children's Hospitals & Clinics of Minnesota, 345 North Smith Avenue, St Paul, MN 55102 (A.B); University of Minnesota, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, 2512 S. 7th St., Minneapolis, MN 55454 (J.P).
Background:
Impaired working memory appears to play a key role in some of the neurocognitive late effects of pediatric brain tumor treatments, including declines in intellectual and executive functioning. Recent studies of pediatric cancer survivors suggest Cogmed® Working Memory Training is effective at improving working memory, although pediatric brain tumor survivors may demonstrate a less robust response than children with other cancers. The current study sought to determine if an extended course of Cogmed (35 sessions) was both feasible and efficacious for brain tumor survivors and if improvements were observable in near-transfer and far-transfer working memory measures as well as parent rating scores at 6 months post-treatment.
Methods:
Twenty pediatric brain tumor survivors ages 8 to 18 years with working memory deficits completed 35 sessions of Cogmed. Assessments of working memory and academic skills were completed at baseline, completion of training, and 6-month follow-up and parents completed questionnaires at baseline and 6-month follow-up.
Results:
Participants showed significant improvements in working memory at training completion and 6-month follow-up and math achievement at 6-month follow-up. Parents reported executive functioning improvements at follow-up as compared with baseline. Participants' program-based working memory skills did not change significantly between sessions 25 and 35, suggesting that extended training did not provide additional benefit.
Conclusions:
This study replicates and extends previous research by: (1) demonstrating that brain tumor survivors at high risk for neurocognitive late effects can complete and benefit from working memory training, (2) identifying a point of diminished returns on training time investment, and (3) demonstrating benefits 6 months post-intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Pilot and Numeric Relaying
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Self-Efficacy

