Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Distributing Reinforcements in Concrete Sections01:22

Design Example: Distributing Reinforcements in Concrete Sections

261
The topic explores the practical aspects of adjusting steel reinforcements within a concrete beam section to meet specific design requirements. When designing a reinforced concrete beam, it is essential to distribute the steel reinforcements properly to ensure structural integrity and efficiency. The example provided details a scenario where a beam requires a total steel cross-section of 4 square inches. The engineer identifies that the available steel bars have a nominal diameter of 1.693...
261
Fascicle Arrangement in Skeletal Muscles01:25

Fascicle Arrangement in Skeletal Muscles

3.8K
Fascicles are bundles of muscle fibers in a skeletal muscle. Muscle fascicle arrangement is directly associated with the power and range of motion of various muscles. The configuration of these fascicles can vary, leading to different functional outcomes.
The four primary types of muscle based on fascicle arrangement are:
3.8K
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

864
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
864
Corrosion of Reinforcement01:27

Corrosion of Reinforcement

524
The corrosion of steel reinforcement within concrete is a process influenced by the material's inherent properties and external factors. The high pH level of around 13, provided by calcium hydroxide present in concrete, initially protects the steel reinforcement by promoting the formation of a passive iron oxide layer on its surface.
However, over time and under certain conditions like carbonation, chloride ingress, and cracking this protective state can be compromised. Steel has areas with...
524
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

476
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
476
Reinforcements in Concrete01:25

Reinforcements in Concrete

450
Reinforced concrete is a composite material used extensively in construction, combining the compressive strength of concrete with the tensile strength of steel. This synergy is essential as concrete, while excellent at resisting compression, is weak under tension. Steel bars, or rebars, are embedded in the concrete to handle these tensile forces. The choice of steel is strategic; it shares a similar coefficient of thermal expansion with concrete, which ensures uniformity in response to...
450

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of a Training Package to Improve the Effectiveness of Descriptive Assessment Data.

Behavior analysis in practice·2023
Same author

Building Community Power To Dismantle Policy-Based Structural Inequity In Population Health.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2022
Same author

The Effects of a Procedure to Decrease Motor Stereotypy on Social Interactions in a Child With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Behavior analysis in practice·2021
Same author

The Importance of Professional Discourse for the Continual Advancement of Practice Standards: The RBT® as a Case in Point.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2020
Same author

Toward an Understanding of the Essential Components of Behavior Analytic Service Plans.

Behavior analysis in practice·2018
Same author

Effects of Reinforcer Magnitude and Quality on Preference for Response-Reinforcer Arrangements in Young Children with Autism.

Behavior analysis in practice·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish
06:46

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish

Published on: July 4, 2021

5.4K

Evaluating Preference and Performance in Accumulated versus Distributed Response-Reinforcer Arrangements.

Regan Weston1, Tonya Davis1, Robert K Ross2

  • 1Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

Behavior Modification
|August 8, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Participants with autism spectrum disorder showed higher task performance with accumulated reinforcement schedules compared to distributed ones. This suggests accumulated reinforcement may be more effective for this population.

Keywords:
accumulated reinforcementcontinuous reinforcementdiscontinuous reinforcementdistributed reinforcementresponse–reinforcer arrangementschedules of reinforcement

More Related Videos

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
07:32

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement

Published on: August 20, 2010

19.9K
A Novel Procedure for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Tastants in Laboratory Rats: Operant Intraoral Self-administration
11:16

A Novel Procedure for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Tastants in Laboratory Rats: Operant Intraoral Self-administration

Published on: February 6, 2014

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish
06:46

Accumulation and Distribution of Fluorescent Microplastics in the Early Life Stages of Zebrafish

Published on: July 4, 2021

5.4K
Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
07:32

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement

Published on: August 20, 2010

19.9K
A Novel Procedure for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Tastants in Laboratory Rats: Operant Intraoral Self-administration
11:16

A Novel Procedure for Evaluating the Reinforcing Properties of Tastants in Laboratory Rats: Operant Intraoral Self-administration

Published on: February 6, 2014

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Reinforcement Schedules

Background:

  • Understanding reinforcement schedules is crucial for designing effective interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
  • Previous research has explored various reinforcement strategies, but direct comparisons of accumulated versus distributed schedules in ASD populations are limited.
  • Task performance and preference are key indicators of intervention efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of accumulated versus distributed response-reinforcer arrangements on task performance in individuals with ASD.
  • To assess participant preference for either the accumulated or distributed reinforcement schedule.
  • To provide empirical data on the effectiveness of different reinforcement schedules for individuals with autism.

Main Methods:

  • Three males diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder participated in the study.
  • Participants completed tasks under both accumulated and distributed response-reinforcer arrangements, differentiated by color-coded token boards.
  • A multielement design was employed to compare response rates across conditions, followed by a preference assessment.

Main Results:

  • All participants demonstrated a higher rate of responding under the accumulated schedule of reinforcement.
  • The use of color-coded token boards effectively distinguished between the two reinforcement arrangements.
  • Preference assessment data indicated a tendency towards one arrangement, though the primary finding was the difference in response rates.

Conclusions:

  • Accumulated response-reinforcer arrangements appear to be more effective in increasing task performance rates for individuals with autism spectrum disorder compared to distributed arrangements.
  • The findings suggest that reinforcement schedule design is a significant factor in optimizing behavioral interventions for ASD.
  • Further research should explore the generalization of these findings across different tasks and populations within the autism spectrum.