Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Creation of Abdominal Adhesions in Mice
Published on: August 27, 2016
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of organisms causing secondary abdominal infections in patients with perforated
Praveen Kumar-M1, Nusrat Shafiq2, Pradeep Kumar3
1Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Background:
Secondary peritonitis, following intestinal perforation, constitutes a significant proportion of cases admitted as a surgical emergency and has a mortality rate of 6-21% worldwide. As a part of an antimicrobial stewardship program, we noted considerable variation among the choice of empirical regimens among such cases. Hence, we conducted a prospective study to generate the evidence for a rational empiric regimen for patients with secondary peritonitis following intestinal perforation.
Methods:
The study included a complete follow up of 77 cases of secondary peritonitis admitted during a 12 month period. The intraoperative fluid (peritoneal) sample of the patient was sent for culture and sensitivity pattern analysis.
Results:
The sites of perforation as seen in decreasing order were lower gastrointestinal (GI) (50.6%), upper GI (36.4%), and unclassified (13%). The most common organism found in the intraoperative fluid was Escherichia coli (47.9%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.5%). amikacin, cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem were sensitive in 22 (out of 23 tested), 5 (out of 9), 13 (out of 13) and 22 (out of 22) isolates of E. coli and 3 (out of 6), 1 (out of 3), 4 (out of 6), 4 (out of 6) isolates of K. pneumoniae, respectively. The most common empirical antibiotic was cefoperazone-sulbactam (38.7%) followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (29.3%).
Conclusion:
Based on our prospective study, piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenem should be used empirically in patients presenting with complicated intra-abdominal infections secondary to perforated viscus, especially if they have sepsis or septic shock.
Insights
For secondary peritonitis from intestinal perforation, piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenem are recommended empirical antibiotics. These agents show good sensitivity against common pathogens like E. coli and K. pneumoniae.
Area of Science:
- Surgical infections
- Antimicrobial stewardship
- Clinical microbiology
Background:
- Secondary peritonitis following intestinal perforation is a common surgical emergency with high mortality.
- Empirical antibiotic regimens vary significantly, necessitating evidence-based guidance.
- Antimicrobial stewardship programs aim to optimize antibiotic use in critical care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the most effective empirical antibiotic regimen for secondary peritonitis due to intestinal perforation.
- To provide evidence for rational antibiotic selection in a prospective study.
- To address variations in current clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 77 patients with secondary peritonitis over 12 months.
- Analysis of intraoperative peritoneal fluid for culture and sensitivity patterns.
- Evaluation of common bacterial isolates and their antibiotic susceptibility.
Main Results:
- Lower gastrointestinal perforation was most common (50.6%), followed by upper GI (36.4%).
- Escherichia coli (47.9%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.5%) were the predominant organisms.
- Piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem demonstrated high sensitivity against E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates.
Conclusions:
- Piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenem are recommended as empirical treatments for complicated intra-abdominal infections from perforated viscus.
- These antibiotics are particularly advised for patients with sepsis or septic shock.
- Evidence supports optimizing empirical antibiotic therapy for secondary peritonitis.
Related Concept Videos
Abdominal Aorta
The celiac trunk, a singular artery, divides into the left gastric artery, which...
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
Abdominal Regions and Quadrants
The simpler quadrants approach, which is more commonly used in medicine, subdivides the cavity with one horizontal and one vertical line that intersects at the patient's umbilicus (navel). The four...
Secondary Lymphoid Organs
The spleen is a vital organ in the lymphatic system, nestled in the upper left side of the abdomen. It is composed of two primary regions: the red pulp and the white pulp, each having distinct functions. The red pulp performs a significant role in blood filtration. It efficiently purges the blood of old or damaged red blood cells and...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Secondary Active Transport

