Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Channelrhodopsin2 Mediated Stimulation of Synaptic Potentials at Drosophila Neuromuscular Junctions
Published on: March 16, 2009
Biogeochemical Changes During Bio-cementation Mediated by Stimulated and Augmented Ureolytic Microorganisms
Michael G Gomez1, Charles M R Graddy2, Jason T DeJong3
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. mggomez@uw.edu.
Enriching native soil microbes for Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) shows similar soil improvements to using non-native bacteria. However, native microbes may alter the timing and spread of bio-cementation and its effects.
Area of Science:
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Environmental Microbiology
- Biogeochemistry
Background:
- Microbially Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) uses urease-producing microorganisms to cement soil particles with calcite.
- Current MICP methods often rely on introducing non-native bacteria, increasing costs and environmental concerns.
- Utilizing native soil microorganisms for MICP could offer a more sustainable and cost-effective approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the biogeochemical differences between MICP mediated by native versus augmented (Sporosarcina pasteurii) ureolytic microorganisms.
- To compare the large-scale bio-cementation efficacy and temporal progression of native and augmented microbial communities in granular soils.
- To explore the role of urea hydrolysis in MICP and its impact on calcite precipitation dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Conducted large-scale bio-cementation experiments in two 1.7-meter diameter tanks.
- Performed complementary soil column experiments to assess microbial community effects.
- Analyzed biogeochemical changes, calcite distribution, engineering properties, and precipitate microstructure.
Main Results:
- Post-treatment calcite distribution and soil engineering properties were comparable between native and augmented microbial approaches.
- Significant differences were observed in ureolysis and calcite precipitation rates between native and augmented communities.
- These rate differences influenced the temporal progression and spatial distribution of bio-cementation and solution chemistry.
Conclusions:
- Enrichment of native ureolytic microorganisms is a viable alternative to non-native bacteria for soil bio-cementation.
- While overall soil improvements may be similar, native microbial communities can alter the dynamics of MICP.
- Understanding microbial community differences is crucial for optimizing MICP processes for specific applications.
Related Concept Videos
What are Biogeochemical Cycles?
Hydration of Cement
Soundness of Cement
Types of Microorganisms
Mutations in Microorganisms
Portland Cement

