Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Investigating medical malpractice victim compensation: micro-level evidence from a professional liability insurer's
Samantha Bielen1, Peter Grajzl2,3, Wim Marneffe1
1Faculty of Business Economics, Hasselt University, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
Abstract:
We examine micro-level data on medical incidents recorded by a major Belgian professional liability insurer to identify the predictors of medical malpractice victim compensation. The data allow us to track each instance of suspect medical malpractice from the moment of insurer's knowledge about the incident to file closure. We are, therefore, able to investigate the determinants of both the incidence and amount of indemnity payment while addressing the associated sample selection concerns. Conditional on some indemnity having been paid, provider specialty risk predicts the indemnity payment amount, but only via the effect of sustained injury type. We find little evidence of vertical or horizontal inequities in indemnity payment. Our results highlight previously overlooked features of the incident resolution process as quantitatively important predictors of victim compensation.
Insights
This study identifies key factors influencing medical malpractice compensation. The incident resolution process, rather than provider characteristics, significantly predicts victim payouts.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Health Economics
- Insurance Studies
Background:
- Medical malpractice claims involve complex resolution processes.
- Understanding compensation determinants is crucial for fairness and efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictors of medical malpractice victim compensation using micro-level data.
- To investigate determinants of indemnity payment incidence and amount.
- To analyze the impact of the incident resolution process on compensation.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of micro-level data from a Belgian professional liability insurer.
- Tracking malpractice incidents from insurer notification to file closure.
- Statistical modeling to address sample selection concerns and identify predictors.
Main Results:
- Provider specialty risk predicts indemnity amount indirectly through sustained injury type.
- Little evidence of vertical or horizontal inequities in indemnity payments.
- Features of the incident resolution process are significant predictors of victim compensation.
Conclusions:
- The incident resolution process plays a critical, often overlooked, role in determining malpractice compensation.
- Focusing on resolution process factors can improve understanding and potentially fairness in compensation.
- Further research into specific resolution mechanisms is warranted.
More Related Videos
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
09:14Experimental Strategies to Bridge Large Tissue Gaps in the Injured Spinal Cord after Acute and Chronic Lesion
Published on: April 5, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and patients...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.