Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Impact of baseline coronary flow and its distribution on fractional flow reserve prediction
Lucas O Müller1, Fredrik E Fossan1, Anders T Bråten2,3
1Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Insights
Estimating baseline coronary flow significantly impacts fractional flow reserve (FFR) predictions for stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Addressing stenosis geometry and drug effects is crucial for improving FFR accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Accurate diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements.
- Model-based FFR prediction requires assumptions, notably the definition of baseline coronary flow.
- Current methods for estimating baseline coronary flow vary, potentially affecting diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of different baseline coronary flow estimation methods on reduced-order model FFR predictions.
- To assess the influence of these methods on the diagnostic performance for stable CAD.
- To identify key factors limiting FFR prediction accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Improved and validated a reduced-order model against a 3D model for FFR prediction.
- Applied and compared various literature methods for estimating and distributing baseline coronary flow.
- Analyzed 105 invasive FFR measurements from 63 patients with suspected stable CAD.
Main Results:
- The choice of baseline coronary flow estimation significantly impacted FFR predictions and diagnostic performance.
- No tested method significantly reduced the standard deviation of prediction errors.
- Inherent uncertainties in stenosis geometry and hyperemia induction drugs were identified as major limitations.
Conclusions:
- Baseline coronary flow estimation is a critical factor in model-based FFR prediction for stable CAD.
- Current methods do not sufficiently improve prediction accuracy.
- Future advancements require addressing geometric uncertainties and the physiological effects of hyperemic agents.
Abstract:
Model-based prediction of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the context of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis requires a number of modelling assumptions. One of these assumptions is the definition of a baseline coronary flow, ie, total coronary flow at rest prior to the administration of drugs needed to perform invasive measurements. Here we explore the impact of several methods available in the literature to estimate and distribute baseline coronary flow on FFR predictions obtained with a reduced-order model. We consider 63 patients with suspected stable CAD, for a total of 105 invasive FFR measurements. First, we improve a reduced-order model with respect to previous results and validate its performance versus results obtained with a 3D model. Next, we assess the impact of a wide range of methods to impose and distribute baseline coronary flow on FFR prediction, which proved to have a significant impact on diagnostic performance. However, none of the proposed methods resulted in a significant improvement of prediction error standard deviation. Finally, we show that intrinsic uncertainties related to stenosis geometry and the effect of hyperemic inducing drugs have to be addressed in order to improve FFR prediction accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Flow
Blood Flow
Couette Flow
Laminar Flow
Flow Table Test
Concrete is placed within a truncated cone mold that is 8 inches high with an 8-inch base diameter and a 5-inch top diameter. The...
Flow Cytometry
In...

