Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Neurotransmitters01:30

Classification of Neurotransmitters

5.1K
Neurotransmitters play a crucial role in the communication between neurons in the autonomic nervous system. Neurons in the autonomic nervous system can be cholinergic or adrenergic depending on the neurotransmitters synthesized. Cholinergic neurons use acetylcholine as their primary neurotransmitter. This includes all the preganglionic fibers of the sympathetic and pre- and postganglionic fibers of the parasympathetic nervous systems. In addition, neurons of the somatic nervous system also use...
5.1K
Classification of Leukocytes01:30

Classification of Leukocytes

5.0K
Leukocytes are classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of cytoplasmic granules. Granular leukocytes, which contain granules, belong to the myeloid lineage and are divided into three subtypes: neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils. These cells are roughly spherical and characterized by the granules in their cytoplasm.
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...
5.0K
Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

9.6K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
9.6K
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

2.3K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
2.3K
Classification of Illness01:17

Classification of Illness

8.6K
The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
8.6K
Brick Classifications01:16

Brick Classifications

373
Bricks, a fundamental component of construction, are categorized based on their application and structural characteristics into several types. These include facing bricks, building bricks, hollow bricks, paving bricks, and firebricks. Facing bricks, also referred to as face bricks, are primarily used for both structural support and visual appeal, making their appearance a crucial aspect. In contrast, building bricks are typically used in concealed sections of a structure, such as behind the...
373

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aging disrupts spatiotemporal coordination in the cycling murine ovary.

Nature aging·2026
Same author

Rapid development and field evaluation of a portable CRISPR-based assay for Mpox during the 2025 Sierra Leone outbreak.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

DNA methylation mediates the multiple sclerosis onset risk associated with HHV-6 DNA positivity.

Environmental epigenetics·2026
Same author

Rapid Cas13a-based <i>pen</i>A genotyping for cefixime susceptibility in <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i>.

mSphere·2026
Same author

Characterization of the first complete genome sequence of yellow fever virus (YFV) in Sierra Leone: Implications for public health.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2026
Same author

Oral and plasma microbiome in the context of acute febrile illness.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same journal

A viral ORFeome library for systems-level genetic dissection of host-pathogen interactions.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Co-option of lysosomal machinery shapes the evolution of the intracellular photosymbiosis supporting coral reefs.

Cell·2026
Same journal

LEF1 and niche factors determine T cell stemness across chronic diseases.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Recurrent patterns of TOP1-mediated neuronal genomic damage shared by major neurodegenerative disorders.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Four-dimensional molecular mapping from a spatial snapshot reveals the dynamics of hair follicle organogenesis.

Cell·2026
Same journal

Whole-cell particle-based digital twin simulations from 4D lattice light-sheet microscopy data.

Cell·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.0K

Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification.

Simon H Ye1, Katherine J Siddle2, Daniel J Park3

  • 1Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Cell
|August 10, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Metagenomic sequencing tools are vital for analyzing microbial communities. This study benchmarks 20 classifiers using simulated and real data to guide researchers in selecting optimal methods for accurate taxonomic classification.

More Related Videos

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
09:34

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.5K
Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
16:05

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: May 28, 2007

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.0K
A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
09:34

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.5K
Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
16:05

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: May 28, 2007

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Metagenomic sequencing enables comprehensive microbial community analysis.
  • Numerous software tools exist for taxonomic classification of metagenomic data.
  • Rapid tool development necessitates performance benchmarking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current metagenomic analysis approaches.
  • To evaluate the performance of 20 metagenomic classifiers.
  • To provide a framework for future classifier comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simulated and experimental metagenomic datasets.
  • Assessed 20 distinct metagenomic classification tools.
  • Employed key performance metrics for evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Identified strengths and weaknesses of various metagenomic classifiers.
  • Provided comparative performance data for selected tools.
  • Established a framework for evaluating new classifiers.

Conclusions:

  • Benchmarking is crucial for selecting appropriate metagenomic analysis tools.
  • The study offers guidance for researchers in metagenomic data interpretation.
  • Future directions in metagenomic data analysis are discussed.