Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay
Published on: June 30, 2020
Strategies for Prescribing Aspirin to Prevent Preeclampsia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Divya Mallampati1, William Grobman, Dwight J Rouse
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Insights
Universal aspirin use is the most cost-effective strategy for preventing preeclampsia, significantly reducing cases and healthcare costs compared to other screening methods. This approach offers better outcomes for maternal health and healthcare economics.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Preeclampsia poses significant risks to maternal and fetal health.
- Effective screening and prophylaxis strategies are crucial for managing preeclampsia.
- Current guidelines and screening methods vary in their cost-effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different preeclampsia screening and aspirin prophylaxis strategies.
- To compare universal aspirin use, biomarker/ultrasound screening, USPSTF guidelines, and no aspirin use.
- To identify the optimal strategy for preeclampsia prevention based on cost and clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A decision analysis model was developed to compare four aspirin use strategies.
- Strategies included: no aspirin, biomarker/ultrasound screening, USPSTF guidelines, and universal aspirin use.
- Preeclampsia-related costs and incidence per 100,000 women were primary outcomes; sensitivity analyses were performed.
Main Results:
- Universal aspirin administration dominated all other strategies, resulting in fewer preeclampsia cases and lower overall costs.
- Compared to universal aspirin, USPSTF guidelines, biomarker/ultrasound screening, and no aspirin use were associated with higher costs and more cases.
- Monte Carlo simulations indicated universal aspirin was preferred in 91% of simulations.
Conclusions:
- Universal aspirin administration is the most effective and cost-effective strategy for preeclampsia prevention.
- This strategy leads to reduced preeclampsia incidence and healthcare expenditures.
- Findings support widespread adoption of universal aspirin prophylaxis in pregnancy.
Objective:
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of various preeclampsia screening and aspirin prophylaxis strategies, including a strategy based on biomarker and ultrasound measures.
Methods:
We designed a decision analysis to compare preeclampsia-related costs and effects of four strategies for aspirin use in pregnancy initiated before 16 weeks of gestation to prevent preeclampsia. The four strategies were: 1) no aspirin use, 2) biomarker and ultrasound measure-predicated use, 3) use based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, and 4) universal aspirin use. Our outcomes were preeclampsia-related costs and number of cases per 100,000 pregnant women. Using a threshold of $90,843 per case of preeclampsia, one-way, two-way, and Monte-Carlo sensitivity analyses incorporating varying probabilities of risk reduction due to aspirin use, aspirin-related side effects, and costs were performed to identify ranges at which costs and risks of aspirin-related complications shifted the preferred strategy.
Results:
Compared with universal aspirin administration, the use of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines is associated with $8,011,725 higher health care costs and 346 additional cases of preeclampsia per 100,000 pregnant women; biomarker and ultrasound screening is associated with an additional $19,216,551 and 308 additional cases. Similarly, no aspirin use is associated with an increased cost of $18,750,381 and 762 additional cases. Thus, universal aspirin use dominated all three other strategies. In a Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 pregnant women, universal aspirin was the preferred strategy in 91% of simulations. The U.S. Preventive Task Force screen was preferred in 8.5% of simulations, and biomarker and ultrasound screening and no aspirin were preferred in 0% and 0.5% of simulations, respectively.
Conclusion:
Over a broad range of assumptions, universal aspirin administration is associated with fewer cases of preeclampsia and fewer costs relative to no aspirin administration and aspirin administration based on serum and ultrasound measures or clinical risk factors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
Preventive Healthcare Services
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...

