Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

14:04
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation
Published on: August 26, 2011
13.0K
Neural Correlates of Public Apology Effectiveness
Hoh Kim1, Jerald D Kralik2, Kyongsik Yun2
1Graduate School of Culture Technology, Seoul, South Korea.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|August 13, 2019
Summary
Organizations should issue public apologies that detail internal, controllable crisis causes. This approach, focusing on organizational control, is most effective for resolving public crises and rebuilding trust.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Crisis Communication
Background:
- Public apologies are effective for interpersonal conflict resolution.
- The efficacy of organizational public apologies after crises is less understood.
- Apologies may mitigate crisis reoccurrence fears by detailing events and corrective actions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if public apologies are more effective when crises stem from internal, controllable sources.
- To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the assessment of organizational control in public apologies.
Main Methods:
- Participants evaluated crisis scenarios with either internal-controllable or external-uncontrollable apology types.
- Neuroimaging techniques examined brain activity during the assessment of apology effectiveness.
Main Results:
- The internal-controllable (IC) public apology was significantly more effective in resolving crisis perceptions.
- The frontal polar cortex was identified as mediating the assessment of organizational control.
- The angular gyrus was found to process this control information for apology evaluation.
Conclusions:
- Public apologies are most effective when they emphasize internal and controllable crisis origins.
- Specific brain regions, including the frontal polar cortex and angular gyrus, are involved in evaluating organizational control during crisis response.
- Studying public reactions to corporate crises offers insights into complex social cognition and high-level brain function.
Related Concept Videos
Correlations
35.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
35.8K
Correlation and Causation
42.0K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
42.0K
Correlation
14.8K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
14.8K
Correlation and Regression
3.1K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
3.1K
Coefficient of Correlation
8.5K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.5K
Neural Regulation
43.2K
Digestion begins with a cephalic phase that prepares the digestive system to receive food. When our brain processes visual or olfactory information about food, it triggers impulses in the cranial nerves innervating the salivary glands and stomach to prepare for food.
43.2K

