Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis
Yaoji Liao1, Guozhen Gao2, Lulu Mo1
1School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Insights
The Braden Q scale shows moderate predictive ability for pediatric pressure ulcers, with medium sensitivity but low specificity in hospitalized children. Further tool development is recommended for improved accuracy in this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nursing
- Clinical Risk Assessment
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Pediatric pressure ulcers pose a significant healthcare challenge.
- Early identification of pressure ulcer risk is crucial for effective intervention.
- The Braden Q scale is a common but debated tool for assessing pediatric pressure ulcer risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the predictive power of the Braden Q scale for pressure ulcers in hospitalized children.
- To provide recommendations for clinical decision-making regarding the Braden Q scale's utility.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of multiple English and Chinese databases for relevant studies.
- Screening by two independent reviewers and risk of bias assessment using QUADAS-2.
- Meta-analysis of pooled sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves using random-effects models.
Main Results:
- Significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I² = 61.7%).
- Pooled sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78) and pooled specificity was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.59-0.63).
- The area under the ROC curve was 0.7078, indicating moderate overall predictive accuracy.
Conclusions:
- The Braden Q scale demonstrates moderate predictive validity for pressure ulcers in hospitalized children.
- The scale exhibits medium sensitivity and low specificity, suggesting limitations in its current application.
- Further refinement and modification of the Braden Q scale are necessary for optimal use in pediatric populations.
Aims:
Paediatric pressure ulcers are a serious problem to healthcare service. Thus, effective and early identification of the risk of developing pressure ulcer is essential. The Braden Q scale is a widely used tool in the risk assessment of paediatric pressure ulcer, but its predictive power is controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive power of the Braden Q scale for pressure ulcer in hospitalised children and offer recommendations for clinical decision.
Methods:
Studies that evaluated the predictive power of the Braden Q scale were searched through databases in English and Chinese, including Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, SinoMed, CNKI, Wangfang and VIP. The studies were screened by two independent reviewers. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias of eligible studies. Demographic data and predictive value indices were extracted. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated by MetaDiSc 1.4 using random-effects models.
Results:
Cochran Q = 26.13 (P = 0.0036) indicated the existence of heterogeneity; the I2 for pooled DOR was 61.7%, suggesting significant heterogeneity among the included studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0. 59-0.63), respectively, yielding a combined DOR of 3.47 (95% CI: 2-6.01). The area under the ROC curve was 0.7078 ± 0.0421, and the overall diagnostic accuracy (Q*) was 0.6591 ± 0.0337. Sensitivity analysis showed the results were robust.
Conclusion:
The Braden Q scale has moderate predictive validity with medium sensitivity and low specificity for pressure ulcers in hospitalised children. Further development and modification of this tool for use in paediatric population are warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Improving Translational Accuracy
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Accuracy and Precision

