Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sex-linked Disorders01:43

Sex-linked Disorders

108.4K
Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.
108.4K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.6K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.6K
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

488
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
488
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.1K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.1K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.3K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fundamental social motives in men and women across 42 societies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Intrasexual competition predicts willingness to engage in risky weight loss behaviors: sex differences and similarities.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Responses to political partisans are shaped by a COVID-19-sensitive disease avoidance psychology: A longitudinal investigation of functional flexibility.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Bridging psychology and engineering to make technology work for people.

The American psychologist·2019
Same author

Facial gender interferes with decisions about facial expressions of anger and happiness.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2017
Same author

An Evolutionary Perspective on Mate Rejection.

Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
06:28

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Published on: July 28, 2023

818

Functional sex differences and signal forms have coevolved with conflict.

D Vaughn Becker1, Shelli L Dubbs2

  • 1Human Systems Engineering Program, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212. vaughn.becker@asu.eduwww.public.asu.edu/~loids/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|August 14, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Evolutionary theory predicts sex differences in aggression and expectations of behavior. It also suggests facial expressions of anger and happiness coevolved with conflict for signaling and social interaction.

More Related Videos

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
06:28

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Published on: July 28, 2023

818
Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Human behavior
  • Social cognition

Background:

  • Evolutionary theory provides a framework for understanding human social behaviors.
  • Conflict and aggression are key areas where evolutionary pressures may have shaped distinct male and female tendencies.
  • Facial expressions are crucial for social communication and may have evolved in response to social challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore evolutionary predictions regarding sex differences in conflict proclivity.
  • To examine complementary biases in societal expectations of male and female behavior.
  • To investigate the potential coevolution of facial expressions (anger, happiness) and conflict for signaling purposes.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis based on evolutionary principles.
  • Review of existing literature on aggression, sex differences, and facial expression evolution.
  • Conceptual modeling of coevolutionary dynamics between conflict and facial signaling.

Main Results:

  • Evolutionary theory predicts observable sex differences in the propensity to initiate and engage in conflict.
  • Societal expectations of male and female behavior often reflect these predicted complementary biases.
  • Facial expressions, specifically anger and happiness, may have evolved alongside conflict to facilitate signaling, bluffing, and de-escalation.

Conclusions:

  • Evolutionary theory offers robust predictions about the nature and expression of conflict in humans.
  • Understanding these evolutionary underpinnings is crucial for explaining sex-based behavioral differences and social expectations.
  • The coevolution of facial expressions and conflict highlights the adaptive significance of non-verbal communication in managing social interactions.