Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.9K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.9K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

915
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
915
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oscillometric blood pressure values in infants at 3, 6 and 12 months of age: a cohort study.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same author

Maternal Body Mass Index, Offspring Impaired Skin Barrier Function, Allergic Sensitization, and Bronchial Obstruction.

Allergy·2026
Same author

Dystrophia Smolandiensis is characterized by a novel NQO1 variant and a distinct phenotype from COL17A1-associated epithelial recurrent erosion dystrophy.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same author

Maternal BMI, early-life growth, and atopic dermatitis by age 3 years.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global·2026
Same author

Signs of immune dysregulation in second-trimester maternal blood RNA profiles in late-onset preeclampsia.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Midpregnancy maternal circulating angiogenic biomarkers: Associations with placental dysfunction-related pregnancy complications and fetal sex.

Placenta·2025
Same journal

Model-based quantification of protein-protein interaction aberrations for exploring dysregulated signalling pathways through pathway maps and gene expression levels.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Research on multi-trait genome association study method based on Shannon information entropy.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A multi-view feature fusion framework with interpretable graph convolution for predicting microbe-drug associations.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Covariance decomposition for distance based species tree estimation.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Highly-Multiplexed Tissue Imaging with Raman Dyes
07:18

Highly-Multiplexed Tissue Imaging with Raman Dyes

Published on: April 21, 2022

3.3K

Guide for library design and bias correction for large-scale transcriptome studies using highly multiplexed RNAseq

Shintaro Katayama1, Tiina Skoog2, Cilla Söderhäll2,3

  • 1Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, 14183, Huddinge, Sweden. shintaro.katayama@ki.se.

BMC Bioinformatics
|August 15, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces NBGLM-LBC, a new algorithm to correct library biases in RNA sequencing data. This method enhances data integration across multiple library pools, improving the accuracy of gene expression analysis.

Keywords:
Gene expressionLibrary bias correctionNext-generation sequencingTranscriptome

More Related Videos

An Efficient Method for the Isolation of Highly Purified RNA from Seeds for Use in Quantitative Transcriptome Analysis
06:31

An Efficient Method for the Isolation of Highly Purified RNA from Seeds for Use in Quantitative Transcriptome Analysis

Published on: January 11, 2017

10.3K
Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
16:05

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: May 28, 2007

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Highly-Multiplexed Tissue Imaging with Raman Dyes
07:18

Highly-Multiplexed Tissue Imaging with Raman Dyes

Published on: April 21, 2022

3.3K
An Efficient Method for the Isolation of Highly Purified RNA from Seeds for Use in Quantitative Transcriptome Analysis
06:31

An Efficient Method for the Isolation of Highly Purified RNA from Seeds for Use in Quantitative Transcriptome Analysis

Published on: January 11, 2017

10.3K
Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
16:05

Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries

Published on: May 28, 2007

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Standard RNA sequencing (RNAseq) methods, including bulk and single-cell RNAseq, utilize DNA barcodes for sample and cell identification, pooling barcoded cDNAs before sequencing.
  • High-throughput sequencing often involves multiple library pools for large studies, but inter-library correlation can be low due to batch effects, hindering data integration.
  • Single-cell and low-input RNAseq methods amplify pooled libraries via PCR, potentially introducing further biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenge of low correlation and batch effects between multiple RNAseq library pools.
  • To develop and validate a computational method for correcting library biases in highly multiplexed sequencing data.
  • To improve the reliability and integration of gene expression profiles from large-scale RNAseq studies.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated 166 technical replicates across 14 RNAseq libraries prepared using the STRT method.
  • Developed and applied the NBGLM-LBC (Negative Binomial Generalized Linear Model - Library Bias Correction) algorithm.
  • Utilized simulation experiments to assess the requirements for effective library bias correction, such as consistent sample layout.

Main Results:

  • Identified gene-specific patterns in library biases and their association with uneven library yields.
  • Successfully corrected gene expression biases using the NBGLM-LBC algorithm.
  • Demonstrated that while low library yields couldn't be directly corrected, omitting low-yield libraries resolved the issue; NBGLM-LBC requires a consistent sample layout for optimal performance.

Conclusions:

  • The NBGLM-LBC algorithm effectively resolves library biases in RNAseq data.
  • The R source code for NBGLM-LBC is publicly available, facilitating its application in various research fields.
  • This method is suitable for studies employing highly multiplexed sequencing with consistent sample distribution across libraries, such as case-control comparisons.