Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026
Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Published on: March 26, 2015
A Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Fixation Methods in Hamstring-Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
H Fogel1, A Golz2, A Burleson3
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, MA USA.
Background:
There are conflicting results on the biomechanical properties of tibial fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The objective of this study is to compare the initial biomechanical properties of tibial fixation in hamstring-graft ACL reconstruction with interference screw, suspension button, and Tape Locking ScrewTM devices. We hypothesized there are no differences in the initial biomechanical properties of these three tibial fixation techniques.
Methods:
Twenty-one fresh-frozen porcine tibiae were equally divided into three groups of seven tibiae to evaluate the fixation of human hamstring tendon grafts with interference screw, suspension button, or Tape Locking Screw fixation. Using a servohydraulic materials testing system, each graft was subjected to 500 cycles of loading followed by a monotonic failure test.
Results:
Interference screw fixation demonstrated significantly lower cyclic displacement (1.28 ± 0.73 mm) than the other groups fixated with either a suspension button device (2.54 ± 0.27 mm, p = 0.003) or a Tape Locking Screw (2.32 ± 0.42 mm, p = .009), and a significantly greater cyclic stiffness (212.19 ± 40.30 N/mm) than the Tape Locking Screw (137.64 ± 26.17 N/mm, p = 0.002). The interference screw also demonstrated significantly higher pullout stiffness (166.83 ± 23.22 N/mm) than the suspension button (112.78 ± 24.14 N/mm, P = 0.002) and Tape Locking Screw (109.11 ± 12.91 N/mm, P = 0.0002).
Conclusions:
Tibial fixation with an interference screw demonstrated superior biomechanical properties for cyclic testing compared to the suspension button and Tape Locking Screw. Load to failure did not differ between groups, and there were no significant biomechanical differences between the suspension button and Tape Locking Screw fixation devices.
Clinical Relevance:
Despite the initial biomechanical differences, all three fixation devices exhibited mean loads to failure and cyclic displacements below clinically relevant thresholds of failure. These data suggest all three fixation methods are viable options for achieving a functional ACL reconstruction.Level of Evidence: V.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
06:28Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection and Synovial Fluid Lavage in a Rodent Model to Study Joint Inflammation and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis
Published on: September 2, 2025
Related Concept Videos
01:03Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
01:28Carbon-dioxide Fixation
01:26Muscles of the Anterior Neck
01:10Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation
01:26Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
01:14Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...