Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Multidisciplinary transcatheter aortic valve replacement heart team programme improves mortality in aortic stenosis
Dylan R Jones1,2, Derek P Chew1,2, Matthew J Horsfall1
1Cardiology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Implementing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) program significantly reduces mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). This benefit persists even when accounting for interventions, highlighting the program
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is a critical condition requiring timely intervention.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a key treatment modality.
- The impact of integrated TAVR programs and multidisciplinary heart teams on long-term outcomes requires further analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of establishing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) program and a multidisciplinary heart team on mortality rates in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).
- To compare outcomes between the pre- and post-TAVR implementation eras.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational cohort study utilizing echocardiography, cardiothoracic surgery, and TAVR databases (2006-2016).
- Inclusion of 3399 patients with echocardiographically defined severe AS.
- Analysis of all-cause mortality within 5 years, employing inverse probability weighting and Cox proportional hazards models.
Main Results:
- Overall 5-year mortality was 47.5%.
- Patients in the post-TAVR era were older with lower ejection fraction and more severe AS but fewer comorbidities.
- A significant mortality benefit was observed in the post-TAVR era (HR=0.86, p=0.015), which became more pronounced after matching for clinical factors (HR=0.82, p=0.001) and persisted after adjusting for intervention (HR=0.84, p=0.005).
Conclusions:
- Implementation of a TAVR program is associated with a significant mortality benefit for patients with severe AS.
- This benefit is independent of increased access to aortic valve intervention.
- Multidisciplinary TAVR programs contribute to improved survival in severe AS populations.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Anatomy of the Heart
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

