Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
Published on: March 28, 2018
Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a
Steen Harsted1, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen2,3, Lise Hestbæk1,4
11Research Unit for Clinical Biomechanics, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Insights
Markerless motion capture systems show promise for assessing gross motor function in children, with acceptable validity for jump height and length. However, some measures like knee varus require further investigation for reliability in pediatric research.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanical analysis
- Pediatric kinesiology
- Motion capture technology
Background:
- Assessing early motor function is crucial for understanding later musculoskeletal health.
- Marker-based motion capture is valid but lab-dependent.
- Markerless systems offer potential for field-based assessments in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concurrent validity and reliability of a markerless motion capture system (The Captury) in preschool children.
- To compare markerless system measurements with a gold-standard marker-based system (Vicon).
Main Methods:
- 14 preschool children (3-6 years) performed squats and broad jumps.
- Simultaneous data collection using Vicon (marker-based) and The Captury (markerless) systems.
- Analysis of variables including jump kinematics, joint angles, and inter-limb coordination ratios.
Main Results:
- Agreement and reliability varied across variables.
- Acceptable agreement for jump height (ICC: 0.91) and jump length.
- Unacceptable agreement for knee varus (ICC: 0.29).
Conclusions:
- The Captury system shows acceptable validity and reliability for specific measures like jump kinematics and certain coordination ratios.
- Measurements are not interchangeable with Vicon but offer potential for research outside lab settings.
- Further clinimetric evaluation is needed for widespread adoption in pediatric research.
Background:
Investigations into the possible associations between early in life motor function and later in life musculoskeletal health, will require easily obtainable, valid, and reliable measures of gross motor function and kinematics. Marker-based motion capture systems provide reasonably valid and reliable measures, but recordings are restricted to expensive lab environments. Markerless motion capture systems can provide measures of gross motor function and kinematics outside of lab environments and with minimal interference to the subjects being investigated. It is, however, unknown if these measures are sufficiently valid and reliable in young children to warrant further use. This study aims to document the concurrent validity of a markerless motion capture system: "The Captury."
Method:
Measures of gross motor function and lower extremity kinematics from 14 preschool children (age between three and 6 years) performing a series of squats and standing broad jumps were recorded by a marker-based (Vicon) and a markerless (The Captury) motion capture system simultaneously, in December 2015. Measurement differences between the two systems were examined for the following variables: jump length, jump height, hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle dorsi flexion, knee varus, knee to hip separation distance ratio (KHR), ankle to hip separation distance ratio (AHR), frontal plane projection angle, frontal plane knee angle (FPKA), and frontal plane knee deviation (FPKD). Measurement differences between the systems were expressed in terms of root mean square errors, mean differences, limits of agreement (LOA), and intraclass correlations of absolute agreement (ICC (2,1) A) and consistency of agreement.
Results:
Measurement differences between the two systems varied depending on the variables. Agreement and reliability ranged from acceptable for e.g. jump height [LOA: - 3.8 cm to 2.2 cm; ICC (2,1) A: 0.91] to unacceptable for knee varus [LOA: - 33° to 19°; ICC (2,1) A: 0.29].
Conclusions:
The measurements by the markerless motion capture system "The Captury" cannot be considered interchangeable with the Vicon measures, but our results suggest that this system can produce estimates of jump length, jump height, KHR, AHR, knee flexion, FPKA, and FPKD, with acceptable levels of agreement and reliability. These variables are promising for use in future research but require further investigation of their clinimetric properties.
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics of Simple Harmonic Motion
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving
Hydraulic Jump
Reliability and Validity
Kinematic Equations - I
Characteristics of Life

