Standard Versus Cyclic Teriparatide and Denosumab Treatment for Osteoporosis: A Randomized Trial

In the absence of an intervening antiresorptive agent, cyclic administration of teriparatide does not increase bone mineral density (BMD) more than standard daily therapy. Because denosumab is a potent antiresorptive agent with a rapid off-effect, we hypothesized that it might be the optimal agent to help maximize bone gains with cyclic teriparatide. In this 3-year protocol, 70 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to 18 months of teriparatide followed by 18 months of denosumab (standard) or three separate 12-month cycles of 6 months of teriparatide followed by 6 months of denosumab (cyclic). BMD (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) measurements of lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and 1/3 radius (RAD) were performed every 6 months and total body bone mineral (TBBM) at 18 and 36 months. Baseline descriptive characteristics did not differ between groups except for a minimal difference in LS BMD but not T-score (mean age 65 years, mean LS T-score - 2.7). In the standard group, BMD increments at 36 months were: LS 16%, TH 4%, FN 3%, and TBBM 4.8% (all p < 0.001 versus baseline). In the cyclic group, 36-month BMD increments were similar: LS 12%, TH 4%, FN 4%, and TBBM 4.1% (all p < 0.001 versus baseline). At 36 months, the LS BMD increase with standard was slightly larger than with cyclic (p = 0.04), but at 18 months, in the cyclic group, there was no decline in RAD or TBBM (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively, versus standard). Although the cyclic regimen did not improve BMD compared with standard at 36 months, there appeared to be a benefit at 18 months, especially in the highly cortical skeletal sites. This could be clinically relevant in patients at high imminent risk of fracture, particularly at nonvertebral sites. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.