Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare?
Alice M Rivlin1, Willem Daniel1
1Brookings Institution, Economic Studies, 1775 Massachusetts Ave, Washington DC, USA.
Abstract:
About 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans but do so at a relatively high-cost. This paper explores the advantages and challenges of introducing competitive bidding among MA plans (Plan One) or among MA plans and Fee-for-Service (Plan Two or Premium Support). We conclude that competitive bidding could reduce the cost of Medicare, especially in densely populated urban areas. However, there would be serious challenges in rural areas and risk adjustment methodology would have to be substantially improved. In Plan Two, sicker beneficiaries might move to Fee-for-Service and beneficiaries might have to pay more to stay with a preferred provider or broader network. If these problems are addressed, we believe that premium support can be a meaningful improvement to the MA program.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
Mate Choice
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Factors Affecting α-Alkylation of Ketones: Choice of Base
The reaction involving bases like EtO− whose conjugate acid EtOH (pKa = 15.9) is stronger than the ketone (pKa = 19.2) results in an equilibrium mixture with higher ketone concentration. As a consequence,...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy

