Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
The Impact of Pharmaceutical Innovation on Cancer Mortality in Belgium, 2004-2012
1Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 504 Uris Hall, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027,USA.
Abstract:
Cancer mortality declined in Belgium during the period 2004-2012, but there was considerable variation in the rate of decline across cancer sites (breast, lung, etc.). I analyze the effect that pharmaceutical innovation had on cancer mortality in Belgium, by investigating whether the cancer sites that experienced more pharmaceutical innovation had larger subsequent declines in mortality, controlling for changes in cancer incidence. The measures of mortality analyzed - premature (before ages 75 and 65) mortality rates and mean age at death - are not subject to lead-time bias. Premature cancer mortality rates are significantly inversely related to the cumulative number of drugs registered 15-23 years earlier. Since mean utilization of drugs that have been marketed for less than 10 years is less than one fourth as great as mean utilization of drugs that have been marketed for at least a decade, it is not surprising that premature mortality is strongly inversely related only to the cumulative number of drugs that had been registered at least 10 years earlier. Drugs registered during the period 1987-1995 are estimated to have reduced the premature cancer mortality rate in 2012 by 20%. Mean age at death from cancer increased by 1.17 years between 2004 and 2012. The estimates indicate that drugs registered during the period 1987-1995 increased mean age at death from cancer in 2012 by 1.52 years. The estimates also suggest that drugs (chemical substances) within the same class (chemical subgroup) are not "therapeutically equivalent," i.e. they do not have essentially the same effect in the treatment of a disease or condition. The estimates imply that the drugs registered during 1987-1995 reduced the number of life-years lost to cancer at all ages in 2012 by 41,207. The estimated cost per-life-year gained in 2012 from cancer drugs registered in Belgium during the period 1987-1995 was €1311. This estimate is well below even the lowest estimates from other studies of the value of a life-year saved. The largest reductions in premature mortality occur 15-23 years after drugs are registered, when their utilization increases significantly. This suggests that, if Belgium is to obtain substantial additional reductions in premature cancer mortality in the future (15 or more years from now) at a modest cost, pharmaceutical innovation (registration of new drugs) is needed today.
Insights
Pharmaceutical innovation significantly reduces cancer mortality. New cancer drugs registered 10+ years prior are linked to lower premature death rates and increased lifespan, with substantial life-years gained at a low cost.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmaceutical Science
- Public Health
Background:
- Cancer mortality rates in Belgium declined between 2004-2012, with variations across cancer types.
- The impact of pharmaceutical innovation on cancer mortality trends requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the effect of pharmaceutical innovation on cancer mortality in Belgium.
- To determine if cancer sites with greater pharmaceutical innovation experienced larger declines in mortality, controlling for incidence changes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of premature cancer mortality rates and mean age at death, measures resistant to lead-time bias.
- Correlation of mortality data with the cumulative number of drugs registered 15-23 years prior.
Main Results:
- Premature cancer mortality rates showed a significant inverse relationship with the number of drugs registered at least 10 years earlier.
- Drugs registered between 1987-1995 were estimated to reduce premature cancer mortality by 20% in 2012.
- Mean age at death from cancer increased by 1.17 years (2004-2012), with an estimated 1.52-year increase attributable to drugs registered 1987-1995.
Conclusions:
- Pharmaceutical innovation, particularly drugs registered a decade or more prior, is strongly linked to reduced premature cancer mortality.
- The cost-effectiveness of cancer drugs is high, with significant life-years gained at a low cost per life-year.
- Continued pharmaceutical innovation today is crucial for substantial future reductions in premature cancer mortality.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Impact of Groups on Groups
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Impact
When particles with different initial velocities collide, they induce deformation by applying equal and opposite impulses. At the point of maximum deformation, the particles move together with...
Factors Influencing Drug Absorption: Pharmaceutical Parameters
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Excipients and Impurities-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

