Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Rat Burn Model to Study Full-Thickness Cutaneous Thermal Burn and Infection
Published on: August 23, 2022
Air-fluidized therapy in the treatment of severe burns: A retrospective study from a burn intensive care unit in
Stefanie Nickl1, Alexandra Fochtmann-Frana1, Jakob Nedomansky1
1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Introduction:
Air-fluidized therapy (AFT) has long been used in the treatment of severe burns. In patients with extensive burns involving the posterior trunk, we aim to keep affected posterior areas dry and to postpone their treatment, initially applying available split-thickness skin grafts in functionally more important regions. We retrospectively assessed the impact of AFT on the survival of patients treated in the burn intensive care unit (ICU) of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between 2003 and 2016.
Methods:
This retrospective single-center study included patients aged ≥18 years with burned total body surface area (TBSA) ≥20% and IIb-III° thermal injuries on the posterior trunk who received AFT. Survival rates were compared with those predicted by the abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI). Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed.
Results:
Seventy-five of 110 patients with posterior trunk burns received AFT. Their survival rate exceeded that predicted by the ABSI score (mean ABSI, 10.0 ± 2.0; 73.3% (95% CI: 62-83%) survival rate vs. 20-40% predicted; p < 0.0001); no such difference was observed in the non-AFT group (mean, 8.8 ± 1.9; 65.7% (95% CI: 48-81%) survival rate vs. 50-70% predicted). Patients receiving AFT had significantly greater TBSA (median, 50% (35-60) vs. 30% (25-45) and longer ICU stays (median, 63 (36-92) vs. 18 (9-52) days; both p < 0.0001). Fifty-one (68.0%) patients in the AFT group and 26 (74.3%) patients in the non-AFT group underwent posterior trunk surgery (p = 0.66) a median of 16 (10-26) and 5 (2.5-9.5) days, respectively, after admission (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions:
Patients receiving AFT had significantly better survival than predicted by ABSI score in contrast to patients not receiving AFT although burn injuries in this group were more severe (greater TBSA, higher ABSI). As intensive care was similar in these groups aside from AFT, the better survival could be attributed to this additional therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Measurement: Derived Units
Measurement: Standard Units
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...

