Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026
A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Reliability of 3D texture analysis: A multicenter MRI study of the brain
Daniel Ta1, Muhammad Khan1,2, Abdullah Ishaque1
1Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Background:
Texture analysis (TA) is an image-analysis technique that detects complex intervoxel statistical patterns. 3D TA has shown potential in detecting cerebral degeneration not perceptible to the human eye in many neurological disorders. The reliability of this method's application in a multicenter study is unknown.
Purpose:
To assess the intrasite and intersite reliability of a novel 3D TA method from data acquired systematically from the Canadian ALS Neuroimaging Consortium (CALSNIC).
Study Type:
Prospective multicenter data with harmonized MR sequence parameters acquired from five sites.
Population:
Six healthy subjects.
Field Strength:
3T 3D-MPRAGE and 3D-SPGR T1 -weighted MRI of the brain.
Assessment:
Voxel-based 3D TA was performed on the whole brain to produce texture maps.
Statistical Tests:
Intra- and intersite reliability of texture features was assessed using a two-way mixed-effects model for intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). ICCs were calculated in a region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of predetermined anatomically relevant areas. A voxelwise approach was used to assess the whole brain.
Results:
In the ROI analyses, intrasite reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.75) across most regions and texture features (autocorrelation [autoc], contrast [contr], energy [energ]). Intersite reliability was excellent for most regions with autoc, ranging from fair to excellent for contr, and ICCs ranging from poor to good (<0.40-0.75) for energ. Voxelwise analyses revealed a large range in ICC across the brain for both intrasite and intersite ICCs (0.0-0.90), with higher reliability in the cortical gray matter compared with deeper subcortical structures.
Data Conclusion:
Overall, the reliability of 3D TA was highly dependent on texture feature, region studied, and method of analysis (ROI or voxelwise). Intrasite reproducibility was good to excellent, and better than intersite. ROI-based analyses present higher reliability in comparison with voxelwise analyses. Autoc has overall excellent reliability. These factors might be considered when designing future 3D TA studies.
Level Of Evidence:
2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1200-1209.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Reliability and Validity
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
01:25Shape and Texture of Coarse Aggregate
01:25Distribution Reliability and Automation
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
01:22Case Studies