Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

A Coregistered Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging Protocol for the Transvaginal Imaging of Ovarian Lesions
Published on: March 3, 2023
Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical
Theresa Palm1, Evelyn Wenkel1, Sabine Ohlmeyer1
1Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Background:
Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is known to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions via the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Here, the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for differentiation and further characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions and their subtypes in a clinically feasible protocol is investigated.
Material And Methods:
This study included 85 patients (with 68 malignant and 73 benign lesions) who underwent 3 T breast DWI using three b values (50, 750, 1500 s/mm2), with a total measurement time < 5 min. ADC maps were calculated from b values 50, 750 s/mm2. The diffusion kurtosis model was fitted to the diffusion weighted images, yielding in each lesion the average kurtosis-corrected diffusion coefficient DK and mean kurtosis K. Histopathology was obtained of radiologically suspicious lesions; follow-up scans were used as a standard of reference for benign appearing lesions. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the parameters' diagnostic performance for differentiation of lesion types and grades. The difference in diffusion parameters between subgroups was analysed statistically using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis test, applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing where necessary.
Results:
ADC, DK and K showed significant differences between malignant and benign lesions (p < 10-5). All parameters had similar areas under the curve (AUC) (ADC: 0.92, DK: 0.91, K: 0.89) for differentiation of malignant and benign lesions. Sensitivity was highest for ADC (ADC: 0.96, DK: 0.94, K: 0.93), as well as specificity (ADC: 0.85, DK: 0.82, K: 0.82). ADC and DK showed significant differences between tumor histologic grades (p = 6.8⋅10-4, p = 6.6 · 10-5, respectively), whereas K did not (p = 0.99). All three parameters differed significantly between subtypes of benign lesions (ADC: p < 10-5, DK: p< 10-5, K: p = 4.1·10-4), but not between subtypes of malignant lesions (ADC: p = 0.21, DK: p = 0.25, K: p = 0.08).
Conclusion:
DKI parameters and conventional ADC can differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. Differentiation performance was best for ADC. Different tumor grades were significantly different in ADC and DK, which may have an impact on therapy planning and monitoring. In our study, K did not add value to the diagnostic performance of DWI in a clinical setting.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Diffusion
Diffusion
Microsoft Excel: Finding Central Tendency, Skew, and Kurtosis
Mean: The arithmetic average of all data points. It is calculated by adding all the values together and dividing by the number of values. The mean is sensitive to extreme values (outliers).
Median: The middle value when the data points are arranged in ascending or descending...
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Facilitated Diffusion
In this process, substrates such as organic compounds and ions interact with a transporter on one side, triggering conformational changes in proteins that enable...
Behavior of Gas Molecules: Molecular Diffusion, Mean Free Path, and Effusion

