Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
Published on: August 14, 2018
Opposite cortical fractures in closed-wedge HTO: New classification and treatment algorithm
Anton Dorofeev1, Alfred Tylla1, Wolf Robert Drescher2
1Sana Klinikum Rummelsberg, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rummelsberg 71, 90592 Schwarzenbruck, Germany.
Opposite cortical fractures (OCFs) in closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) impact stability. A new classification identifies unstable OCFs prone to displacement, aiding prognosis and treatment strategies for mechanical complications.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomechanics
- Radiology
Background:
- Intact opposite cortex (OC) is crucial for high tibial osteotomy (HTO) stability.
- Identifying opposite cortical fracture (OCF) types is vital for predicting mechanical complications.
- This study aims to classify OCFs in CWHTO and develop a treatment algorithm.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a classification system for opposite cortical fractures (OCFs) in closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO).
- To correlate OCF types with the incidence of mechanical complications.
- To propose a treatment algorithm based on the OCF classification.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological results from 187 angle-stable navigated CWHTOs.
- Classification of OCFs into two main types based on fracture line direction.
- Subclassification into three subtypes (A-nondisplaced, B-primarily displaced, C-secondarily displaced).
Main Results:
- Type 1 OCFs were predominantly non-displaced (67.6%), while Type 2 had a higher rate of secondary displacement (36.2%).
- Displaced Type 2 OCFs (2B, 2C) showed a significantly higher rate of tibial pseudoarthrosis (30.8%) compared to non-displaced Type 2A (4.8%).
- OCF types 1B, 2B, and 2C correlated with mechanical complications, with Type 2C fractures showing a markedly higher risk (OR 43.8) for tibial pseudoarthrosis.
Conclusions:
- Type 1 OCFs are stable, whereas Type 2 OCFs are unstable and prone to displacement.
- Intraoperative recognition of Type 2 OCFs was limited (57.4%), highlighting the need for careful postoperative radiographic assessment.
- The proposed OCF classification offers clinically relevant therapeutic guidance for CWHTO procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Wedges
Consider using a wedge to lift a heavy slab. Here, the wedge functions by converting the applied force into a much larger force directed almost perpendicular to the initial force. This...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Classification of Neurotransmitters
Classification of Leukocytes
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...
Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...

