Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Concept01:19

Self-Concept

1.5K
Self-concept is the cognitive and emotional understanding individuals hold about their identity. It evolves through various developmental stages, beginning in infancy and maturing as children grow. This concept influences how individuals perceive their abilities, interact with others, and manage challenges throughout life.
Infancy and Emerging Recognition
During infancy, self-concept is virtually nonexistent. Babies do not distinguish themselves as separate entities and often mistake their...
1.5K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.3K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

10.9K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Concepts and Prototypes01:24

Concepts and Prototypes

518
The human nervous system handles vast amounts of information by translating sensory stimuli into neural impulses, which the brain processes, creating thoughts expressed through language or stored as memories. The brain also synthesizes information from emotions and memories, which significantly influence thoughts and behaviors. This intricate process creates a comprehensive mental picture.
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
518
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

10.9K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
10.9K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preoperative glenoid retroversion does not influence postoperative outcomes or glenoid lateralization after reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a minimum 2-year follow-up: A retrospective cohort study from the FP-UCBM Shoulder Study Group.

Shoulder & elbow·2026
Same author

Glenoid lateralization angle influences the rate of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study on 139 patients with minimum 2 years follow up from the FP-UCBM Shoulder Study Group.

Shoulder & elbow·2025
Same author

Radiological and Clinical Outcome Differences Between Standard and Short Stem in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Genome-Wide Association Screens for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

Journal of clinical medicine·2024
Same author

Scapular Kinematics and Patterns of Scapular Dyskinesis in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2023
Same author

The role of physical activity as conservative treatment for massive rotator cuff tears in elderly patients: a systematic review.

Acta orthopaedica Belgica·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

3.7K

Hip scores: A current concept review.

Umile Giuseppe Longo1, Mauro Ciuffreda1, Vincenzo Candela1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Trigoria, Rome, Italy.

British Medical Bulletin
|August 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Numerous hip pain scoring systems exist, but a single, universally accepted outcome evaluation tool is still needed for reliable and valid assessment. Further research is essential.

Keywords:
Arthroplasty;ArthroscopyHipScales;ScoresSports

More Related Videos

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.5K
Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip
08:43

Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip

Published on: September 29, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
08:40

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs

Published on: April 19, 2024

3.7K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.5K
Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip
08:43

Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip

Published on: September 29, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Medical assessment tools

Background:

  • Several rating scales have been developed over decades to assess functional status in patients with hip pain.
  • The evaluation of hip function is crucial for treatment planning and outcome assessment in orthopedic surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize the available scoring systems for hip function assessment.
  • To identify gaps and areas for future research in hip outcome evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL.
  • Keywords included 'hip', 'scoring system', 'scale', 'scores', 'outcome assessment', 'arthroplasty', 'arthroscopy', and 'clinical evaluation'.

Main Results:

  • A total of 16 hip scoring systems are currently available for clinical evaluation.
  • Questionnaires are categorized into physician-rated and patient-rated types.
  • Interpretation challenges arise due to differing domain emphasis across systems.

Conclusions:

  • Despite the availability of multiple hip scoring systems, a single, reliable, valid, and sensitive outcome evaluation system is still lacking.
  • There is a need for further research to develop a unified and improved hip function assessment tool.