Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Requesting reprints: is it worth it?

W C Donlon1

  • 1Facial Pain Research Center, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA 94115.

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
|October 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Bizarro world of osteodistraction.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1998
Same author

Oral and maxillofacial surgery approaching the year 2000.

Journal of the California Dental Association·1996
Same author

Associated bony procedures for preservation.

Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·1996
Same author

Simultaneous otoplasty and temporomandibular arthroplasty.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1992
Same author

Comparison of clinical characteristics in myogenic, TMJ internal derangement and atypical facial pain patients.

The Clinical journal of pain·1990
Same author

Multifactorial facial pain--differential diagnosis: a case report.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1990
Same journal

Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: historical perspective and future objectives.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis presenting with parotid gland involvement in an adult: literature review.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Postoperative auditory outcomes in total temporomandibular joint replacement: fossa-canal proximity and tinnitus risk.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided resection of buccal mucosa cancer.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Systematic review of autologous midface reconstruction methods: subtotal maxillary defects.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same journal

Automated true vertical line determination for orthognathic surgery virtual planning using smartphone photography and open-source applications.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
See all related articles

Reprint requests are a common way to stay updated with scientific literature. This study assessed how efficient and cost-effective these requests are for researchers.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Information Science
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Reprint requests are a traditional method for researchers to obtain scientific articles.
  • Keeping abreast of scientific literature is crucial for research advancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficiency of using reprint requests for literature acquisition.
  • To determine the cost-effectiveness of reprint requests in scientific research.

Main Methods:

  • The study likely involved analyzing the success rate and associated costs of fulfilling reprint requests.
  • Data collection may have included tracking request fulfillment times and expenses.

Main Results:

  • The findings will detail the efficiency metrics and cost-benefit analysis of the reprint request system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Results will indicate whether reprint requests are a viable and economical method for accessing research.

    • Conclusions:

    • The study concludes on the overall utility of reprint requests as a tool for scientific literature dissemination.
    • Recommendations may be provided regarding the optimization or alternative methods for literature access.