Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Microfabrication of Nanoporous Gold Patterns for Cell-material Interaction Studies
Published on: July 15, 2013
Platinum, gold, and silver standards of intermolecular interaction energy calculations
Monika Kodrycka1, Konrad Patkowski1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.
Abstract:
High-accuracy noncovalent interaction energies are indispensable as data points for potential energy surfaces and as benchmark values for improving and testing more approximate approaches. The preferred algorithm (the gold standard) for computing these energies has been the coupled-cluster method with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] converged to the complete basis set (CBS) limit. However, gold-standard calculations are expensive as correlated interaction energies converge slowly with the basis set size, and establishing the CBS limit to better than 0.05 kcal/mol typically requires a CCSD(T) calculation in a basis set of at least triple-zeta quality. If an even higher accuracy is required (for example, for the assignment of complicated high-resolution spectra), establishing a superior platinum standard requires both a precisely converged CCSD(T)/CBS limit and the corrections for the core correlation, relativistic effects, and higher-order coupled-cluster terms at least through the perturbative quadruple excitations. On the other hand, if a triple-zeta CCSD(T) calculation is not feasible but a double-zeta one is, it is worthwhile to look for a silver standard that provides the most accurate and consistent approximation to the gold standard at a reduced computational cost. We review the recent developments aimed at (i) increasing the breadth and diversity of the available collection of gold-standard benchmark interaction energies, (ii) evaluating the best computational strategies for platinum-standard calculations and producing beyond-CCSD(T) potential energy surfaces for spectroscopic and scattering applications of the highest precision, and (iii) improving the accuracy of the silver-standard, double-zeta-level CCSD(T)/CBS estimates through the use of explicit correlation and midbond basis functions. We also outline the remaining challenges in the accurate ab initio calculations of noncovalent interaction energies.
Related Concept Videos
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes
Intermolecular Forces in Solutions
When the strengths of the intermolecular forces of attraction between solute and solvent species in a solution are no different than those present in the separated components, the solution is formed with no accompanying energy change. Such a solution is called an ideal solution. A mixture of ideal gases (or gases such as helium and argon,...
Intermolecular Forces
Calculating Standard Deviation
The standard deviation value is small when all the data is concentrated close to the mean. Here the data exhibits low variation. The standard deviation value is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean. Here, the data displays high...
Standard Deviation of Calculated Results
A broad Gaussian distribution curve has a wider standard deviation, representing a data set with...
Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces

