Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Multiplex PCR and Reverse Line Blot Hybridization Assay mPCR/RLB
Published on: August 6, 2011
Development of a Differential Multiplex PCR Assay for the Supplemental Identification of Different Sources of
Christopher M Thompson1, Quanyin Gao1, Zhengfei Lu2
1Herbalife Manufacturing, LLC, 20481 Crescent Bay Dr, Lake Forest, CA 92630.
Background:
Differentiation of proteins from multiple sources provides challenges in the accuracy using multiple and often disputed protein identification methods. The U.S. Pharmacopeia Food Chemical Codex does not include monographs for many protein sources, including milk proteins and soy protein isolate. Monographs that are included for proteins do not list a single comprehensive identification method but instead rely on a combined assessment of ash (total), fat, lactose, loss on drying, and protein content. A fast, inexpensive, and accurate protein source assay is tantamount to prevention of economic adulteration in protein powders.
Objective:
This study describes the development of a novel method to identify and differentiate animal proteins (cow protein powders as milk protein and whey protein) and plant proteins (soy protein powders). These proteins powders are of high importance to the food and dietary supplement industries, as they encompass the highest grossing and fastest growing protein sources in the global protein powder market.
Methods:
The developed method uses PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis of short chain DNA fragments found in processed protein powders to identify and differentiate the source of each powder. The original development was performed using reference materials of known identity and tested against an inclusivity panel of protein powders from commercial sources. Bands were identified using the Agilent Tapestation 4200 and Tapestation Analysis Software A.02.02 (SR1) using proprietary band analysis.
Results:
The developed method was found to be specific for the identification of each protein source, passing a computational (National Center for Biotechnology Information Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) exclusivity panel and an experimental inclusivity panel. The method was also able to detect multiple adulterants in concentrations as low as 1% (w/w).
Conclusions:
The developed method is fast, inexpensive, and accurate (100%) for the supplemental identification of cow and soy proteins and able to detect adulteration as low as 1% (w/w).
Highlights:
A new method can identify cow and soy proteins, and detect low levels of adulteration using DM-PCR.
More Related Videos
09:03Multiplex PCR Assay for Typing of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec Types I to V in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Published on: September 5, 2013
11:12Assay Development for High Content Quantification of Sod1 Mutant Protein Aggregate Formation in Living Cells
Published on: October 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Proteins: Dietary Sources and Requirements
PCR
Sinusoidal Sources
In homes, the power supplies use sinusoidal sources to provide electricity. These sources generate a voltage that varies sinusoidally...
Source Transformation
It is essential to note that when...
AC Sources
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...