Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Principles for evaluating knowledge co-production in natural resource management: Incorporating decision-maker values
Ruth A O'Connor1, Jeanne L Nel2, Dirk J Roux3
1Climate Change Institute, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia; Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Knowledge co-production in natural resource management requires inclusive processes. Decision-makers value science for legitimacy and use practical knowledge for context, emphasizing communicative competence for effective collaboration.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Management
- Social Sciences
- Transdisciplinary Research
Background:
- Transdisciplinary processes, including knowledge co-production, aim to integrate diverse knowledge systems for complex natural resource management issues.
- Academic framing of knowledge co-production often prioritizes research design and 'science informing policy' outcomes.
- A broader perspective is needed to incorporate the values and experiences of non-academic participants and the participatory process itself.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a more inclusive and holistic framework for knowledge co-production.
- To examine the communication and deliberation of knowledge within co-production processes.
- To identify requirements for effective knowledge co-production from the perspective of natural resource managers.
Main Methods:
- Empirical data collection through interviews with natural resource managers.
- Analysis of two case studies of knowledge co-production in Australia and South Africa.
- Development of eight evaluation principles based on participant perspectives, extending existing public participation frameworks.
Main Results:
- Decision-makers utilize science-based outputs not only for knowledge but also to legitimize their decisions.
- Transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in knowledge selection, participation, and dialogue are crucial for legitimacy.
- Practice-based knowledge from decision-makers is vital for contextualizing and applying scientific information.
- Communicative competence is essential for participants to critically understand diverse knowledge claims.
Conclusions:
- Effective knowledge co-production necessitates integrating diverse values and ensuring procedural fairness.
- Legitimacy in decision-making is enhanced through transparent and inclusive co-production processes.
- Enhanced communicative competence among participants fosters deeper understanding and better application of knowledge in natural resource management.
Related Concept Videos
Biodiversity and Human Values
The Uncertainty Principle
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Professional Values
The values that are the foundation of the nursing profession are altruism, autonomy, human dignity, and social justice.
First, altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well-being of others without personal...

