Can children be affected by bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw? A systematic review

Nathália Tuany Duarte1, Bruna de Oliveira Rech1, Isabela Godoy Martins2

  • 1Special Care Dentistry Centre (CAPE), Department of Stomatology of the University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil; Oral Pathology, Department of Stomatology of the University of São Paulo School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil.

Insights

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is rare in children, but studies are limited. Further research is needed to understand the long-term risks in pediatric patients using bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) knowledge primarily stems from adult cases.
  • Bisphosphonates are increasingly used for pediatric osteoporosis, raising concerns about BRONJ risk in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a literature review on the incidence and risk factors of BRONJ in children and adolescents.
  • To identify gaps in current research regarding pediatric BRONJ.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic search of PubMed, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases.
  • Inclusion of studies on bisphosphonate use in individuals under 24 years old; exclusion of reviews and case reports.
  • Analysis of seven eligible publications identified from an initial 56.

Main Results:

  • No cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were identified in the reviewed pediatric studies.
  • All included studies exhibited limitations, including small sample sizes and lack of detailed risk factor analysis.
  • A consensus exists on the need for further investigation into pediatric BRONJ.

Conclusions:

  • While BRONJ appears rare in children, current evidence is insufficient to definitively assess risk.
  • Long-term follow-up of pediatric patients using bisphosphonates into adulthood is recommended.
  • Further high-quality studies are crucial to establish definitive conclusions on pediatric BRONJ.

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.4K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
12.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.8K