Hybrid IRBM-BPNN Approach for Error Parameter Estimation of SINS on Aircraft
Weilin Guo1, Yong Xian2, Daqiao Zhang2
1Xi'an Research Institute of High Technology, Xi'an 710025, China. gwlttxs@163.com.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 28, 2019
Summary
This study introduces a hybrid improved restricted Boltzmann machine BP neural network (IRBM-BPNN) to forecast strap-down inertial navigation system (SINS) errors. The IRBM-BPNN method significantly enhances SINS error parameter estimation and aircraft navigation accuracy.
Area of Science:
- * Navigation Systems Engineering
- * Artificial Intelligence in Aerospace
- * Signal Processing and Estimation Theory
Background:
- * Strap-down inertial navigation systems (SINS) are crucial for aircraft navigation but are susceptible to instrument and alignment errors.
- * Accurate estimation of these errors is essential for improving overall navigation precision.
- * Existing methods often struggle to achieve optimal accuracy in complex error forecasting scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To develop a novel hybrid approach for estimating SINS error parameters.
- * To enhance the navigation accuracy of aircraft by improving SINS error forecasting.
- * To introduce an improved restricted Boltzmann machine BP neural network (IRBM-BPNN) for this purpose.
Main Methods:
- * Analysis of SINS error generation mechanisms and establishment of error models.
- * Utilizing an unsupervised Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM) to initialize a BP neural network (BPNN).
- * Developing an IRBM-BPNN model integrating SINS/GPS/CNS data, with enhanced structure and pulse signal input.
Main Results:
- * Simulation experiments demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of the IRBM-BPNN method for SINS error parameter forecasting.
- * The hybrid RBM-BPNN approach significantly improved forecast accuracy compared to standalone BPNN.
- * The enhanced IRBM-BPNN structure yielded optimal forecast accuracy for SINS error parameters and navigation accuracy.
Conclusions:
- * The proposed IRBM-BPNN method offers a superior solution for SINS error parameter estimation.
- * Combining RBM and BPNN, along with structural improvements, effectively boosts forecast accuracy.
- * This approach leads to optimal aircraft navigation accuracy, outperforming traditional methods.
Related Concept Videos
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter
5.0K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
244
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
244
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
9.8K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.8K
Random Error
9.0K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.0K
Margin of Error
7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K


